49 coaches online • Server time: 15:20
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Designer's Comm...goto Post Why did GW nerf guar...goto Post Request to Maintain ...
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
HidaBukkorosu



Joined: Dec 08, 2003

Post   Posted: Apr 02, 2004 - 22:46 Reply with quote Back to top

so you dont accidentally move through one if you dont want to...
IsaiahFrost



Joined: Feb 05, 2004

Post   Posted: Apr 02, 2004 - 22:53 Reply with quote Back to top

No way, seeing the game board is as important in BloodBowl as it is in Chess. Game vision is a skill obtained through lots of practice. If you gave some sort of crutch to players then the game would not be about vision or planning but only about luck.
DoubleSkulls



Joined: Oct 05, 2003

Post   Posted: Apr 05, 2004 - 12:31 Reply with quote Back to top

I disagree - normally in ftf play if you miss a TZ then your opponent lets you take the move back. Obviously the client doesn't let you off!

Something to increase the visibility of TZ would be a good thing IMO.

_________________
Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
Eucalyptus Bowl
veron



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Apr 05, 2004 - 12:46 Reply with quote Back to top

If there'd be a poll on this, I'd say 'nay'.
Doowa



Joined: Nov 25, 2003

Post   Posted: Apr 05, 2004 - 12:48 Reply with quote Back to top

I'm with IsaiahFrost on this one. The ability to have a good view of the board is a skill in BB. It's a skill to find the way around TZs like the art of the 2d block.

_________________
I play the game of life and have never once lost...
Rimmer



Joined: Aug 19, 2003

Post   Posted: Apr 05, 2004 - 13:12 Reply with quote Back to top

Since JavaBowl removes the possible mistakes of illegal procedures I say it is acceptable that you have to plan your move before you move it. Why should lazyness be accepted?

_________________
As always one is always 100% sure about the truth until one learns that it isn´t the truth. Then one is 100% sure that it isn´t the truth.
MixX



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Apr 05, 2004 - 13:21 Reply with quote Back to top

there was another, long, discussion about this like a week ago.. in short, most (but by no means all) who participated in that agreed that there was no need for making BB more fool-proof.
cjohnsto



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Apr 05, 2004 - 13:40 Reply with quote Back to top

Lets face it we don't need or want any more fools.
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic