24 coaches online • Server time: 02:48
Index Search Usergroups Profile
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post UW Goblins - Disturb...goto Post Is kicking first wit...goto Post A Very Steely Setup ...
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
SkiJunkie



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 08, 2003 - 23:59 Reply with quote Back to top

Or make two version. A non .com for the website and a .com for the mugs / t-shirts. Or no cause I see that point as well. Smile

_________________
--SkiJunkie
________________________________
Java BBowl - http://www.geocities.com/javabbowl
Mirror - http://javabbowl.no-ip.org
Mirror - http://home.austin.rr.com/javabbowl
MixX



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 09, 2003 - 00:38 Reply with quote Back to top

to be honest I doubt there'd be much use for the .com in the image, since it (as I understand it) is for the website. However, I agree with Peikko that that's up to whoever chooses the eventual winner to decide...

I wonder what you (Peikko) mean by that "copyright against the law" sentence though...? So far I haven't seen any material that looks copyrighted, but I don't know.. when it comes to voting everyone should know if something is copyrighted or not eh?
peikko



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 09, 2003 - 01:25 Reply with quote Back to top

MixX wrote:

I wonder what you (Peikko) mean by that "copyright against the law" sentence though...? So far I haven't seen any material that looks copyrighted, but I don't know..


There is one entry that uses GW copyrighted miniatures, GW copyrighted BloodBowl playing board... Actually its just combined copyrighted pics with very little modifications. Also people should know that "spiked ball" is GW copyright too.
Mr-Klipp



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 09, 2003 - 03:59 Reply with quote Back to top

peikko wrote:

There is one entry that uses GW copyrighted miniatures


I could be wrong, but those don't look like pictures that GW took of minis they painted to me.

They own a copyright on the models which prevents you from copying and selling the models, but you own the models you purchase and they do not have any copyright over pictures you take of your own models.

_________________
Looking to get your minis painted? Look no further.

The Finishing Touch
kurre



Joined: Oct 14, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 09, 2003 - 18:08 Reply with quote Back to top

the .comīs to be or not to be shouldnt be much of an issue since i am the only one using it, and mine logo are not one of the best.
kurre



Joined: Oct 14, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 09, 2003 - 18:13 Reply with quote Back to top

is not..
peikko



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 09, 2003 - 22:45 Reply with quote Back to top

[quote="Mr-Klipp"]
peikko wrote:

but you own the models you purchase and they do not have any copyright over pictures you take of your own models.


Ok, so with this logic I can go and take my Bloodbowl box, take a pic of Bloodbowl logo and use that pic as part of my own copyrighted thing. Naaaaah.
cusi



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 10, 2003 - 08:54 Reply with quote Back to top

I like the avatar peikko!

_________________
Check out the latest issue of The Grotty Little Newspaper yet?
Mr-Klipp



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 10, 2003 - 09:18 Reply with quote Back to top

peikko wrote:

Ok, so with this logic I can go and take my Bloodbowl box, take a pic of Bloodbowl logo and use that pic as part of my own copyrighted thing. Naaaaah.


No, for a couple of reasons. First, that logo is also covered by a trademark, so different laws apply. Second, it is in that case just another image of the same work, while the other is a an image of a new artistic work, that of the paint job on the model. The exact details of the codes differ from country to country, but that is why these are two different things.

_________________
Looking to get your minis painted? Look no further.

The Finishing Touch
banana_fish900



Joined: Oct 13, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 20, 2003 - 08:00 Reply with quote Back to top

Ok, I'm coming into this late but here's an entry. Is this too complex? It actually is vector art believe it or not. I'm not happy with the lettering but maybe this is an idea that can be improved upon by someone else--happy to share the .psd file w/ anyone who wants it--or a .fla if that works better for you.

<img src="http://www.lehigh.edu/~aew2/christmas/logoFinished.jpg">

Could be part of a nice site subtitle--"Forget about the ball--hold on to your head."
IvanTheCow



Joined: Aug 08, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 20, 2003 - 09:24 Reply with quote Back to top

ummm would writeing FUMBBL on pink soap (ala. Fight Club) be considered unorigional artwork because if it isnt i wish to know before actually makeing that picture
BunnyPuncher



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 20, 2003 - 19:23 Reply with quote Back to top

Klipp is right or pro painters would not be allowed to resell painted figs.

_________________
Image
Christer



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 30, 2003 - 04:11
FUMBBL Staff
Reply with quote Back to top

The logo competition will stop accepting entries really soon now. If you are working on something or intend to submit an entry, please let me know how much more time you will need.
Tolsk



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Mar 07, 2004 - 03:32 Reply with quote Back to top

Image
Kruppe



Joined: Apr 25, 2004

Post   Posted: May 08, 2004 - 10:46 Reply with quote Back to top

Maulers Sjulls only dice is the best so far
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 1.2 © 2003 PNphpBB Group
Credits