Poll |
Do you believe in Evolution? |
Brains ... |
|
52% |
[ 78 ] |
Pie |
|
30% |
[ 45 ] |
Macavity |
|
16% |
[ 25 ] |
|
Total Votes : 148 |
|
AoP-Vimes
Joined: Oct 12, 2007
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 15:28 |
|
Hi guys, i want to start such a ratolution team now, under the scheme of sadistic behaviour called "Ratolution - Chain and Pain". Its because someone in the UI thread has called my skaven masochistic, because they went throught the dark qualifier.
I thought about something lke u mentioned above:
lino (rattus masochisticus) --> lino (rattus subdominantus) --> thrower (rattus sadisiticus)--> thrower (rattus dominantus)--> RO (rattus gigantus sadisiticus)
and
lino (rattus masochisticus) --> lino (rattus ?) --> gutter (rattus )--> gutter (rattus catenatus)--> vermin (rattus verminatus)
Only the second form of each positional is allowed to have mutations, besides the vermin and the RO.
The problem is, that im missing correct latin names and some names for the gutters and throwers, that fits into that scheme.
Woulda be nice, to hear something from you.
Oh... and pls correct me, if I use incorrect forms, i have absolutly never took ANY lessons in latin. |
Last edited by AoP-Vimes on %b %22, %2008 - %15:%Apr; edited 2 times in total |
|
Eghost
Joined: Oct 19, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 15:43 |
|
JanMattys wrote: | Could it be interesting to include a "Mutations access" in the evolutionary tree? Let's say, something like "a player is not allowed to take mutations on doubles unless he has evolved to at least X spps in his previous life"
Which means that you might have GRs who develop without mutations, and when they die you can choose to either become Stormvermins or become gutter runners with Ph access.
Just an idea. After all mutations and Evolution go together pretty well... |
Incorporated in a bit easier form, only the 2nd species of the same postional can have mutations, except the Vermin and Ogre, they're too far on the track already to even dream of |
|
|
AoP-Vimes
Joined: Oct 12, 2007
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 15:45 |
|
kehehe... i dont think of using an apo on a second unmutational form... but okay. I will include this.
Only the second form is allowed to have mutas.
Thx. |
_________________ "he who has relied least on fortune is established the strongest"
Niccolo Machiavelli
---> I have proven the opposite! |
|
Lofwyr
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 15:46 |
|
I would choose other routes, the "AG and ballhandling"-route with thrower, thrower and then GR
and the basher-route, with Stormvermin, Stormvermin to RO. |
|
|
Eghost
Joined: Oct 19, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 15:49 |
|
Aop, I dont think you need latin names, just use english words and put -us behind it Silly online dictionaries are bad, they dont even give a latin word for rat. I had 4 yrs at school but cant remember much, I assume rats are a different class of animals and therefor dont have a direct translation. |
|
|
JanMattys
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 15:54 |
|
As long as I remember, rat = mus, muris |
_________________
|
|
AoP-Vimes
Joined: Oct 12, 2007
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 15:56 |
|
Oh... very well... much thx for it.
Okay... as far as many of you cry, as i write english i think i try it again, and u tell me, what i am spelling wrong
Thx for the advie with the ballhandling. That soundz nice. The only problem is to get four gutters ^^.
I might go with gutters first and then thrower as far as i love the elven like playing with skaven |
_________________ "he who has relied least on fortune is established the strongest"
Niccolo Machiavelli
---> I have proven the opposite! |
|
Eghost
Joined: Oct 19, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 15:56 |
|
Yeah, just read something about it, but it means mouse as well. |
|
|
AoP-Vimes
Joined: Oct 12, 2007
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 15:58 |
|
lino (rattus masochisticus) --> lino 2nd(rattus subdominantus) --> vermin (rattus sadisiticus)--> vermin 2nd (rattus dominantus)--> RO (rattus gigantus dominantus)
and
lino (rattus masochisticus) --> lino 2nd(rattus ?) --> gutter (rattus ropus)--> gutter 2nd(rattus chainus)--> thrower (rattus whippus lashus)
Only the second form of each positional is allowed to have mutations, besides the thrower and the RO. |
Last edited by AoP-Vimes on %b %22, %2008 - %16:%Apr; edited 2 times in total |
|
AoP-Vimes
Joined: Oct 12, 2007
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 16:02 |
|
and now i need some visualization hints how to get the tree into my bviography the way, its posted in the group.
Woulda be quite nice, to have some one to tell me that.
THx 4. |
_________________ "he who has relied least on fortune is established the strongest"
Niccolo Machiavelli
---> I have proven the opposite! |
|
Zaghrog
Joined: Dec 09, 2005
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 16:03 |
|
What should be done with injured players in this kind of teams? They are of no real use (unless they have lots of spp), but they're not dead either. Could they be replaced by another player of the same type, or would this be too much "cheating"? |
_________________ WAAAGH!!
'Ere we go, 'ere we go, 'ere we go... |
|
JanMattys
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 16:06 |
|
Eghost wrote: | Yeah, just read something about it, but it means mouse as well. |
mouse = mus domesticus (I think) |
_________________
|
|
AoP-Vimes
Joined: Oct 12, 2007
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 16:08 |
|
It is their wish to get injured. Its all they long for.
as far as to get injured is some kind of what they want, ill probably would agree with some kind of evolve after they have got their second or third niggling or stat decrease.
Hows about: (2 nigglings) OR (1 niggling + 2 stat decrease) ---> Evolve?
I would guess, that from that way of evolving AND looked at the lower av, they would evolve a much more faster, then zombie teams, so this kind of evolution is the "light" version of ur other undead teams. |
|
|
pac
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 16:18 |
|
Zaghrog wrote: | What should be done with injured players in this kind of teams? They are of no real use (unless they have lots of spp), but they're not dead either. Could they be replaced by another player of the same type, or would this be too much "cheating"? |
As always, the rules you want to use are up to you.
If I retire a player because of injuries (which I will, because I have lots of money and nothing to spend it on) that player fails at evolution (I'm looking at you, spubbbba) and has to go back to square one if it wants to try again.
This hasn't come up too often yet as I apoth perms (and even MNGs) but not RIPs. |
|
|
AoP-Vimes
Joined: Oct 12, 2007
|
  Posted:
Apr 22, 2008 - 16:21 |
|
hmmm
crippled evo = failed evo....
doesnt fit into the sado- maso theme...
k... until the first evos will come, this team is ready to get chained.
Applyied to group and kickoff! |
|
|
|
| |