torsoboy
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/434819601466743fda038c.jpg)
Joined: Nov 23, 2004
|
  Posted:
Dec 25, 2008 - 03:30 |
|
odi wrote: | Balle2000 wrote: |
A 1 time amnesty for bringing any number (or a fixed number) of your Ranked teams into the Blackbox.
|
No! Too meany high ranking teams there that have been built up by dodging or cherry picking... In B you atleast have to really build the team. |
In B, your team cannot continue cherrypicking and according to common wisdom it would mean that that team will break down sooner than later. I'd like a 1 time option to transfer your Ranked teams to Blackbox should B become the dominant division. There are just too many teams with great histories that would be shelved otherwise. |
_________________ The plural of anecdote isn't data. |
|
pythrr
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/19530640744f944516487a1.jpg)
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
  Posted:
Dec 25, 2008 - 05:13 |
|
agreed, and futher i'd argue for a full merge. make b=r, and for those who wish to "select games", let them play in league or unranked. |
_________________
![Image Image](https://fumbbl.com/i/421534) |
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Dec 25, 2008 - 12:33 |
|
I want to make a practical suggestion, helping to spot scheduler missjudgements easier:
When the bot announces a game, put the coach he thinks has an advantage first, then the coach at disadvantage, then the suitability score.
Something like "Coach X (Orcs 160/162) vs Coach Y (Elfs 149/150) @759" sounds OK, whereas "Coach Y (Elfs 149/150) vs Coach X (Orcs 160/162) @759" would then raise an eyebrow. |
|
|