21 coaches online • Server time: 09:15
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Gnomes are trashgoto Post FDL only 3 spots lef...goto Post Secret League Americ...
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Poll
Would you allow backward redeclaration of actions?
I like the UNDO option
4%
 4%  [ 8 ]
I like the petitioning
3%
 3%  [ 5 ]
I've got a better idea (and will post it below)
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
NO!
87%
 87%  [ 144 ]
Pie!
4%
 4%  [ 8 ]
Total Votes : 165


Fela



Joined: Dec 27, 2004

Post   Posted: Sep 13, 2010 - 13:33 Reply with quote Back to top

nin wrote:
I voted "NO"
Why? well, there is a poll and it's the option closer to my oppinion.
If it's going to be ignored, then I don't see the needfor the poll.


Why ignored?
I tried to explain earlier that by that time i mainly tried to find out why people voted 'no' besides the - not very happy - reasons i could offhand come up with.

nin wrote:
For example "undo as far as no rolls has been made" can lead to easy abuse. You take "move" and get into a DT tackle zone and then you notice the skill and instead of dodging you switch to "blitz". Same goes for Prehensile Tail, Tentackles, Pass Block and miscounted assists in a "blitz" (that you could turn into a "move")


This is actually a very good and valid loophole and something i admit freely to not having considered.

Kudos for being the first to come up with a real argument instead of 'I don't like it, because I don't like rule adaptions'.

nin wrote:
Edit: I see flames and trolling... may be I regret posting in such a thread


There have been worse threads IMO. This one is mostly dead now anyway - I would have let it rest too, if your post hadn't been good enough to deserve some response. Smile
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic