Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
 Posted:
Jul 23, 2014 - 17:34 |
 
|
The GW fluff is their own, so it doesn't compare and should not be compared to D&D ever. They have their own world.
ps. is fumbbl running slowly today or is it just me? |
_________________
 |
|
NerdBird
Joined: Apr 08, 2014
|
| Posted:
Jul 23, 2014 - 17:43 |
|
| Garion wrote: | The GW fluff is their own, so it doesn't compare and should not be compared to D&D ever. They have their own world.
ps. is fumbbl running slowly today or is it just me? |
Yes, I just was not aware they had fluff on Were creatures that much... I have seen them mentioned in some of the novels and army books over the years but never a great deal.
Off-topic- Fumbbl is running very slow for me today. |
|
|
harvestmouse
Joined: May 13, 2007
|
| Posted:
Jul 23, 2014 - 17:51 |
|
| Garion wrote: | | whats yours again? I'm sure it will be better than plasmoids which is really terrible now that knights lose S access. Thats such a dumb idea. |
0-16 peasants 6 3 3 7 G
0-2 Squires 7 3 3 7 sure hands G/P
0-4 Knights 7 3 3 8 block G/S
0-2 Grail Knights 4 4 2 9 G/S Thick Skull, Stand firm (will not yield)
Erik Kantona as a cheap and valuable star |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jul 23, 2014 - 17:56 |
|
ah okay, so more akin to 4th ed roster. Yeah, that's a lot better than the plasmoid one, Its good that you dropped the silly Ma7 st4 guys from the 4th ed one, and made the st4 player slow and st3 one quicker, that makes sense. Did you consider including the squire catcher in there as well as the 4th ed one had a catcher iirc, the same as the human one, or is that why you split the difference and made the squire 7337 SH rather than have a catcher and thrower the same as the human roster? |
_________________
|
|
harvestmouse
Joined: May 13, 2007
|
| Posted:
Jul 23, 2014 - 18:09 |
|
I thought as there wasn't a thrower there was no need of a catcher, yet knight variety was optimum. So yeah, I took the 4th ed roster and make a few changes. |
|
|
bghandras
Joined: Feb 06, 2011
|
| Posted:
Jul 23, 2014 - 18:37 |
|
| harvestmouse wrote: |
0-16 peasants 6 3 3 7 G
0-2 Squires 7 3 3 7 sure hands G/P
0-4 Knights 7 3 3 8 block G/S
0-2 Grail Knights 4 4 2 9 G/S Thick Skull, Stand firm |
This one is superior to orc roster supposedly the Grails are BO price, the Knights are blitzer price, and the peasants cost 40k, and Squires are not overly expensive. |
_________________
 |
|
babass
Joined: Apr 20, 2013
|
| Posted:
Jul 28, 2014 - 15:14 |
|
as pro elves and dark elves fan, i would love to try this witch elves roster!
 |
|
|
JimmyFantastic
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
|
| Posted:
Jul 28, 2014 - 15:27 |
|
I hate having Knights on the Bretonnian rooster. |
_________________
Pull down the veil - actively bad for the hobby! |
|
harvestmouse
Joined: May 13, 2007
|
| Posted:
Jul 28, 2014 - 16:19 |
|
| bghandras wrote: | | harvestmouse wrote: |
0-16 peasants 6 3 3 7 G
0-2 Squires 7 3 3 7 sure hands G/P
0-4 Knights 7 3 3 8 block G/S
0-2 Grail Knights 4 4 2 9 G/S Thick Skull, Stand firm |
This one is superior to orc roster supposedly the Grails are BO price, the Knights are blitzer price, and the peasants cost 40k, and Squires are not overly expensive. |
Well I haven't discussed pricing.....simply I'm not very good at it, and I don't really care as I don't use TV.
The Grail Knights are Golems without regen and Golems have never been OP. Feel free to work out the correct pricing, it's not something I get involved in.
JFantastic Roosters and French Knights go hand in hand. We've stayed with the Warhammer theme, and to do so Brets niche is Knights. I see your point on the crossover, however if there is no crossover, there is no point in Bretonnians what-so-ever.
Personally, I 'quite' like the crossover, but prefer 2nd ed style of course.
On a different note. I've started working on a greaser icon and done cyberorc icons (easy ones anyway). |
|
|
harvestmouse
Joined: May 13, 2007
|
| Posted:
Jul 28, 2014 - 16:21 |
|
| babass wrote: | as pro elves and dark elves fan, i would love to try this witch elves roster!
|
Albion Assassins are based off of the elves that landed on Albion. At the time the local folk were unsure if they were fair or dark. So this roster is a Pro/Darky cross. |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jul 28, 2014 - 16:33 |
|
| bghandras wrote: | | harvestmouse wrote: |
0-16 peasants 6 3 3 7 G
0-2 Squires 7 3 3 7 sure hands G/P
0-4 Knights 7 3 3 8 block G/S
0-2 Grail Knights 4 4 2 9 G/S Thick Skull, Stand firm |
This one is superior to orc roster supposedly the Grails are BO price, the Knights are blitzer price, and the peasants cost 40k, and Squires are not overly expensive. |
This isn't what is being used in secret league though I will change the SL roster for Brets at some point as I really don't like it. As for the prices I'm not sure why you think GK would cost the same as bobs. They would be 100k or 110k depending on what you add subtract for balance. |
_________________
|
|
babass
Joined: Apr 20, 2013
|
| Posted:
Jul 28, 2014 - 16:48 |
|
| harvestmouse wrote: | | babass wrote: | as pro elves and dark elves fan, i would love to try this witch elves roster!
|
Albion Assassins are based off of the elves that landed on Albion. At the time the local folk were unsure if they were fair or dark. So this roster is a Pro/Darky cross. |
Albion Assassins?
the only Albion i see are these one:
https://fumbbl.com/help:AlbionT
with blockers and no Ag4 players i don't see them as elves  |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jul 28, 2014 - 16:54 |
|
They are based on Albion fluff. Harvestmouse is talking about a famous dark elf team that played in the Albion blood bowl league. |
_________________
|
|
babass
Joined: Apr 20, 2013
|
| Posted:
Jul 28, 2014 - 17:01 |
|
| Garion wrote: | | They are based on Albion fluff. Harvestmouse is talking about a famous dark elf team that played in the Albion blood bowl league. |
Do you have a link? |
|
|
harvestmouse
Joined: May 13, 2007
|
| Posted:
Jul 28, 2014 - 17:13 |
|
|
|
|
Gnomes are trash
Search
