| Poll |
| Is CLAWPOMB really a problem? |
| Yes, absolutley |
|
55% |
[ 464 ] |
| No, Chaos Dwarfs Disagree |
|
20% |
[ 174 ] |
| Still Haven't Decided |
|
8% |
[ 75 ] |
| Pie! |
|
15% |
[ 127 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 840 |
|
Elijah
Joined: Feb 16, 2015
|
 Posted:
Feb 21, 2015 - 21:44 |
 
|
| Quote: |
Also there is disagreement over what "improvement" would be. Coaches are divided over which is the best rule set, what teams are too strong / not strong enough, changes that should/shouldn't have been made to teams, etc.
There is a great deal of disagreement over changes that have been made in "other" video game versions of Blood Bowl. There is huge variety of opinion over Khorne, Apes, Bretonians, etc.
The BBRC was "official" in their changes, and the community still wasn't behind them in all the changes they made. For that reason, I don't think that applying house rulings to one of the major ways the game is played is a good thing. |
You're probably right, yes. It is a pity the ruleset is not still being update, though. |
|
|
Elijah
Joined: Feb 16, 2015
|
| Posted:
Feb 22, 2015 - 14:28 |
|
I was thinking looking at the Create New Team in the Stunty Leeg teams lists:
why don't we have a sort of "Experimental Official BB Teams League" where, like in the stunty leeg, slowly and steadily new rules could be experimented and teams modified? So maybe after a while, with testing and months, months and months, we could apply those changes to the official ruleset, if like 90% of the community (or if the admins decide to have a more TOP decision-making, which is fair enough, if the 90% of admins say yes)approve the changes?
I'm imagining some sort of crazy laboratory, where most of the potions make the laboratory explode, but when the right mix is made it could be adopted as a new positive mutation?
What do you think? |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Feb 22, 2015 - 21:50 |
|
| ChenZhen wrote: |
Also there is disagreement over what "improvement" would be. Coaches are divided over which is the best rule set, what teams are too strong / not strong enough, changes that should/shouldn't have been made to teams, etc. |
Not a problem really. The two changes that Christer was considering would have been a reasonable start for the Black Box.
The problem is that some people don't want any changes. Even (especially?) changes that might improve the Black Box. |
_________________
[SL] + Official Stunty teams. Progression KO. Old & new teams welcome. 29th May! |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Feb 22, 2015 - 22:14 |
|
| Elijah wrote: | I was thinking looking at the Create New Team in the Stunty Leeg teams lists:
why don't we have a sort of "Experimental Official BB Teams League" where, like in the stunty leeg, slowly and steadily new rules could be experimented and teams modified? So maybe after a while, with testing and months, months and months, we could apply those changes to the official ruleset, if like 90% of the community (or if the admins decide to have a more TOP decision-making, which is fair enough, if the 90% of admins say yes)approve the changes?
I'm imagining some sort of crazy laboratory, where most of the potions make the laboratory explode, but when the right mix is made it could be adopted as a new positive mutation?
What do you think? |
Loads of Nope.
When did democracy ever help things? |
_________________
 |
|
BillBrasky
Joined: Feb 15, 2005
|
| Posted:
Feb 22, 2015 - 22:48 |
|
Democracy is mob rule.
The best run organizations (in my personal experence) have one guy calling the shots.
Luckily we have that here on Fumbbl.
Hail to the king the baby! |
|
|
Calcium
Joined: Apr 08, 2007
|
| Posted:
Feb 22, 2015 - 22:49 |
|
| pythrr wrote: | | Elijah wrote: | I was thinking looking at the Create New Team in the Stunty Leeg teams lists:
why don't we have a sort of "Experimental Official BB Teams League" where, like in the stunty leeg, slowly and steadily new rules could be experimented and teams modified? So maybe after a while, with testing and months, months and months, we could apply those changes to the official ruleset, if like 90% of the community (or if the admins decide to have a more TOP decision-making, which is fair enough, if the 90% of admins say yes)approve the changes?
I'm imagining some sort of crazy laboratory, where most of the potions make the laboratory explode, but when the right mix is made it could be adopted as a new positive mutation?
What do you think? |
Loads of Nope.
When did democracy ever help things? |
Yeah, this is as good an idea as the BBRC |
_________________
 |
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Feb 22, 2015 - 23:13 |
|
| BillBrasky wrote: | Democracy is mob rule.
The best run organizations (in my personal experence) have one guy calling the shots.
Luckily we have that here on Fumbbl.
Hail to the king the baby! |
Man, you've been lucky. I've had the misfortune of working for a few sole proprietors - they don't know what they don't know and they are defiant about that ignorance. |
|
|
BillBrasky
Joined: Feb 15, 2005
|
| Posted:
Feb 22, 2015 - 23:39 |
|
@mrt1212: A good leader listens to his people (common sense, eh?). |
|
|
Wreckage
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
|
| Posted:
Feb 23, 2015 - 00:22 |
|
| BillBrasky wrote: | Democracy is mob rule.
The best run organizations (in my personal experence) have one guy calling the shots. |
The worst run organizations also tend be run by one guy calling the shots...
I think democracy is more about not having spin everything out of control, rather than looking for the best possible leader. |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Feb 23, 2015 - 00:25 |
|
| Wreckage wrote: | | BillBrasky wrote: | Democracy is mob rule.
The best run organizations (in my personal experence) have one guy calling the shots. |
The worst run organizations also tend be run by one guy calling the shots...
I think democracy is more about not having spin everything out of control, rather than looking for the best possible leader. |
/avoids the too-obvious affirmation. |
_________________
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Feb 23, 2015 - 00:29 |
|
|
Roland
Joined: May 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
Apr 01, 2015 - 13:35 |
|
I've heard that the bbrc will temporarily reform and issue an errata of the killstack for BB2  |
|
|
Throweck
Joined: Feb 23, 2013
|
| Posted:
Apr 01, 2015 - 13:37 |
|
| Roland wrote: | | I've heard that the bbrc will temporarily reform and issue an errata of the killstack for BB2 |
April fools don't count after midday (which will only apply to some of us at the moment - thanks K)dude!  |
Last edited by Throweck on %b %01, %2015 - %14:%Apr; edited 1 time in total |
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Apr 01, 2015 - 14:11 |
|
| Throweck wrote: | | Roland wrote: | | I've heard that the bbrc will temporarily reform and issue an errata of the killstack for BB2 |
April fools don't count after midday dude |
it's still morning in some places.
If was true it would probably only be what Plasmoid has put on his web page.
They said that they would 'like to see it tested'.
As O[L]C commish I'd say even with those nerfs it can still get out of hand if a coach is a dedicated CPOMBer.
Definitely an improvement though. |
_________________
[SL] + Official Stunty teams. Progression KO. Old & new teams welcome. 29th May! |
|
arry
Joined: Feb 26, 2014
|
| Posted:
Apr 01, 2015 - 14:21 |
|
In fact the nerfs can be so big that gobbos take the first place. Gotta nerf the goblins and up the cpomb! |
|
|
|
|
| |
NBFL Season 32: The ...
Search
