Slick
Joined: Jul 03, 2004
|
 Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 19:44 |
 
|
Just wondering are there any plans to implement LRB 4.0 in JBB? I'm sure any information on future plans to do this would be appreciated by the Fumbbl community. |
_________________
Some people get "it", and others don't. How about you? Do you get "it"? |
|
Britnoth
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 20:07 |
|
... which part of LRB 4.0 isn't in the client? |
|
|
Webbe
Joined: Aug 13, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 20:14 |
|
| Slick wrote: | | Just wondering are there any plans to implement LRB 4.0 in JBB? I'm sure any information on future plans to do this would be appreciated by the Fumbbl community. |
Well, the RR was implemented about 3 weeks after it was released so I'm not sure what you mean. |
|
|
Slick
Joined: Jul 03, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 20:35 |
|
Perhaps I'm talking about the wrong thing. I was refering to the new skill set that doesnt include RSC and has wrestle and grab. Also the overhaul of the injury system where niggles arent so horrible and such. I was just wondering if these new rules were going to be added/changed in JBB. |
_________________
Some people get "it", and others don't. How about you? Do you get "it"? |
|
Webbe
Joined: Aug 13, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 20:42 |
|
Ahh, those are the vault playtesting rules. As far as I know there are no plans of implemetning them until they get official, and that is not gonna happen for some time.
edit: btw, that is NOT LRB 4, the LRB 4 will just be the LRB3+Rules Review 2004.
Here's a draft
http://www.blood-bowl.net/LRBDRAFT/DRAFT_LRB4.0.pdf |
Last edited by Webbe on %b %18, %2005 - %20:%Mar; edited 3 times in total |
|
mstrchef13
Joined: Dec 11, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 20:45 |
|
That's vault 1.7, pretend they don't exist. |
|
|
Webbe
Joined: Aug 13, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 20:47 |
|
| mstrchef13 wrote: | | That's vault 1.7, pretend they don't exist. |
Well, if you only play on fumbbl, ok. But if you play real blood bowl you should definately try them out. |
|
|
Adar
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 20:56 |
|
| Webbe wrote: | | mstrchef13 wrote: | | That's vault 1.7, pretend they don't exist. |
Well, if you only play on fumbbl, ok. But if you play real blood bowl you should definately try them out. |
First you need to find them which is surprisingly tough... |
_________________
For all his rage, he's still just a rat in it's cage. |
|
Slick
Joined: Jul 03, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 20:58 |
|
Thanx for the responses guys. Personally I hope these rules become official soon so we can start using them around here. Especially the one that says NO AGING! |
_________________
Some people get "it", and others don't. How about you? Do you get "it"? |
|
Webbe
Joined: Aug 13, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 21:16 |
|
| Taffsadar wrote: | | Webbe wrote: | | mstrchef13 wrote: | | That's vault 1.7, pretend they don't exist. |
Well, if you only play on fumbbl, ok. But if you play real blood bowl you should definately try them out. |
First you need to find them which is surprisingly tough... |
Hmm, no
bloodbowl.com, click on experimental rules. Voila! |
|
|
Britnoth
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 21:21 |
|
| Webbe wrote: | | mstrchef13 wrote: | | That's vault 1.7, pretend they don't exist. |
Well, if you only play on fumbbl, ok. But if you play real blood bowl you should definately try them out. |
Please explain how playing LRB games on a java client is not 'real bloodbowl'  |
|
|
vanGorn
Joined: Feb 24, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 22:14 |
|
| Britnoth wrote: | | Please explain how playing LRB games on a java client is not 'real bloodbowl' |
It's virtual Bloodbowl.  |
_________________
Gimme a pint of fungus beer!
Then we will climb the ladder.
 |
|
CorporateSlave3
Joined: Feb 07, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 22:14 |
|
| Britnoth wrote: | | Webbe wrote: | | mstrchef13 wrote: | | That's vault 1.7, pretend they don't exist. |
Well, if you only play on fumbbl, ok. But if you play real blood bowl you should definately try them out. |
Please explain how playing LRB games on a java client is not 'real bloodbowl' |
Yeesh, take it easy. I think it is relatively obvious he is talking about table top...  |
|
|
asperon
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 18, 2005 - 22:23 |
|
| Slick wrote: | | Thanx for the responses guys. Personally I hope these rules become official soon so we can start using them around here. Especially the one that says NO AGING! |
Just join us few brave in DivX, where there is no aging. |
|
|
Webbe
Joined: Aug 13, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 19, 2005 - 09:53 |
|
| Britnoth wrote: |
Please explain how playing LRB games on a java client is not 'real bloodbowl' |
Well, for starters there are several unfixed bugs in the client.
Secondly, on here bb is just a game, 'real' bloodbowl is a hobby, ie more geekish and lots of more fun and you actually can talk to your opponent face to face, taunt him, feel sorry for him, take him on a date or whatever.
Rolling dice yourself hugely beats clicking on them on a screen. Ohh the thrill!
Also you can make your houserules whatever you like and for example try out the vault rules.
Don't get me wrong though, javabowl is fun too and better in some areas, it's easier to find opponents and you can play a lot more games but in the end, it's not real bloodbowl. |
|
|
|
|
Gnome Roster - how a...
Search
