Candlejack
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
 Posted:
May 29, 2005 - 16:40 |
 
|
GGNNNNNAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! not another one!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
*bangs head on table REAL REAL hard*
and Penix.. you don't have to read ALL posts.. but do a search and then skim over it.. that is not too much to ask and keeping to say "I did not want to read all so i started a new one" is well... you do the math |
_________________
--
The Sanity Resort |
|
sk8bcn
Joined: Apr 13, 2004
|
| Posted:
May 29, 2005 - 17:31 |
|
| Candlejack wrote: | GGNNNNNAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! not another one!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
*bangs head on table REAL REAL hard*
and Penix.. you don't have to read ALL posts.. but do a search and then skim over it.. that is not too much to ask and keeping to say "I did not want to read all so i started a new one" is well... you do the math |
Oh no not another:
"Oh no another thread about ...bla bla bla .... search option....."
Title Foul is explicit IMO. |
|
|
Candlejack
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
May 29, 2005 - 17:49 |
|
|
Penix
Joined: May 25, 2005
|
| Posted:
May 29, 2005 - 18:09 |
|
|
DonTomaso
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
|
| Posted:
May 29, 2005 - 19:02 |
|
Well, I think Penix was in his right to start a new thread where he asked about fouling.
The kind of attitude some "oldies" show probably scares away more people than it attracts, and it's a shame.
Make the new guys feel welcome instead of racking down on them for breaking an unwritten rule.
Also, Alcing Ragaholic had an interresting idea. Let the new guys write how they feel about the topic. Might be an eyeopener... might not.
And furthermore, if you don't like the foul-threads, why do you read them? Noone forces you to do so... Just ignore it if you don't like it... Sheesch! |
_________________
====================================
Be careful, my common sense is tingling! |
|
origami
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
|
| Posted:
May 29, 2005 - 19:05 |
|
Rereading old threads is not the same as starting a conversation on a topic. This sort of things builds up the fumbble community, and I'm all for it. Those of us who have had our fill of the topic are free to ignore it. |
|
|
BunnyPuncher
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
May 29, 2005 - 22:59 |
|
Besides 970 of those 1000 posts had nothing to do with fouling  |
_________________
 |
|
Frankenstein
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
|
| Posted:
May 30, 2005 - 12:12 |
|
Fouling or not? Couldn't care less!
But am I the only one who wonders whether "Penix" is a nick within tolerable parameters or not as far as political correctness is concerened?  |
|
|
JanMattys
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
|
| Posted:
May 30, 2005 - 12:14 |
|
| BunnyPuncher wrote: | | Besides 970 of those 1000 posts had nothing to do with fouling |
30 quotes about fouling, 970 quotes about fun.
Not a bad achievement for a large community.
|
_________________
 |
|
Penix
Joined: May 25, 2005
|
| Posted:
May 30, 2005 - 12:21 |
|
If you dislike my nick think in it as Phoenix (his real origin) without "ho"  |
_________________
Why do I foul?
'cause I can |
|
sk8bcn
Joined: Apr 13, 2004
|
| Posted:
May 30, 2005 - 13:15 |
|
candle, for me there is a difference about a lesson:
"You should use the searcg button as stated in the rules of the site"
and the oldie whinning attitude
"oh not anouther [thema] thread discussed 10000000000times. My god use the search button...."
A newcommer won't use it and I find it normal.
If a solution is requiered, it is to reforme the way to subscribe: for exemple: go through a little summary about behaviorism. Not just point out every new guy that does it. |
|
|
Optihut
Joined: Dec 16, 2004
|
| Posted:
May 30, 2005 - 13:23 |
|
I think dirty player should be an agility trait |
|
|
|
|
Gnome Roster - how a...
Search
