Woodpecker
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 18:59 |
|
Okay, it seems we're split about which way to go on this. I personally favor progression, and probably won't play if it's non-prog. Others feel the opposite way.
So here's an idea.
Make two tournaments. |
|
|
DropDeadFred
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 19:04 |
|
im not making 2 tournamants. i personally want it no-porgression but im jus trying to make a tournie to enjoy and if some people dont im gonna try fix it but i cant |
_________________ Sk8bcn is unhappy with my sig so i have changed it to this |
|
thesquig
Joined: Apr 11, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 19:04 |
|
Dont you think that would complicate things just a little bit too much? |
_________________ Nuffle Sucks!!!
|
|
JanMattys
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 19:11 |
|
It seems like many would quit if it's no prog.
While no one stated they would not play if it's normal.
So just let's play normal... who cares until we have fun. |
_________________
|
|
CorporateSlave3
Joined: Feb 07, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 19:12 |
|
thesquig wrote: | Dont you think that would complicate things just a little bit too much? |
What, you mean like two simultaneous threads on the same topic? |
|
|
Woodpecker
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 19:15 |
|
Well, you wouldn't have to run it, DDF. Somebody else could if you gave them permission to use thier idea. |
|
|
JanMattys
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 19:20 |
|
Nice! Two tournaments. One TR100 and one with Progression
And the two winners will fight for the supreme title of International Champion!!!!
...uhm... no, wait... |
_________________
|
|
Woodpecker
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 19:27 |
|
Yeah. The TR 200 teams vs the new teams.
I'll be playing in progression. |
|
|
Smess
Joined: Feb 13, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 19:39 |
|
Don't like the idea to split up the tourney at all.
This way the overall level of both tourneys won't be as high.
Accept the majority view of the poll about prog / non-prog, if you don't like it what's chosen, don't play.
In the end it's DDF's tourney, so he can decide what to do with it.
If you wanna have a tourney like this progression style (if this one is gonna be non prog that is), do it another time and not simultaniously.
Or better: invent your own tourney instead of stealing good ideas |
|
|
DropDeadFred
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 19:42 |
|
hmmm yea ill keep it non-progression sorry people |
_________________ Sk8bcn is unhappy with my sig so i have changed it to this |
|
JanMattys
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 19:44 |
|
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Ok. Now I want an official thread with official words from the official staff.
I am getting bored with this. |
_________________
|
|
DropDeadFred
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 19:45 |
|
IT IS NON-PROGRESSSION |
_________________ Sk8bcn is unhappy with my sig so i have changed it to this |
|
Garaygos
Joined: Feb 24, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 20:01 |
|
can't we make it half progression, half non progression? This way nobody would be 100% happy and thus we'd reach a perfectly democratic situation.
you get half spps you'd normally get (0.5 for completion, etc), BUT only suffer half the rolled amount of cas and aging effects!
I am so brilliant I even amaze myself at times...
/joke mode off |
_________________ The statement below is true.
The statement above is false. |
|
Woodpecker
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
|
Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 20:04 |
|
DropDeadFred wrote: | IT IS NON-PROGRESSSION |
BOOOOO! |
|
|
BunnyPuncher
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Jun 30, 2005 - 20:17 |
|
Good to know... have fun with it boys... I'll be off. |
_________________
|
|
|