TheCetusProject
Joined: May 25, 2004
|
 Posted:
Jul 29, 2005 - 15:03 |
 
|
Yes, but it doesn't make for interesting games, does it? The bloodbowl league system was designed with open leagues in mind... and presumably in open leagues you try to find close games that both sides can win... so why add something that can horribly unbalance these games?
Anyway this is wildly off topic so we should stop now. |
|
|
sk8bcn
Joined: Apr 13, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jul 29, 2005 - 16:33 |
|
The worst thing is BH. How many great player we were SO SATIFIED to foul all game long just to end with a BH. Kinda lame. |
_________________
Join NL Raises from the Ashes |
|
calon
Joined: Oct 03, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jul 29, 2005 - 16:56 |
|
Hey guys way off topic. And definatley can keep fouling out of the thread LOL.
Should have started a poll at the begining of the thread shame i didnt.
But got to be said i really like the idea of capping the legends ssp allow them to accumulate everything else i.e. CP TD IT cas MVP to build up but without the ssp for the player changing
say it was capped at 200 then no matter what the palyer did ssp would stay at 200(or higher if ppl prefer) which would give you a chance tpo keep the legends without having to give away major caps or loose so much money giving you the chance to develop the team. |
|
|
JanMattys
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jul 29, 2005 - 16:58 |
|
It is a minor fix, and anyway in the end it could only be accepted in DivX.
Problem is that DivX is a league without aging.
This would lead to an all-Legends team with no need to worry about management.
ps: I would vote yes if the question is "should it be implemented in ranked?", but no such question will ever be raised, so...  |
_________________
 |
|
Exempt teams
Search
