UrienRakarth
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 26, 2003 - 01:33 |
 
|
With the change of the beast of nurgle, the nurglings team changes slightely... otentacles on a stunty leeg will be too strong? Str 5 is too low for that type of team that rely only on big guys??
What to do now? 
Rebalancing all or simply see what happens? |
|
|
Mazzix
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Nov 26, 2003 - 02:12 |
|
Well, i dont see any problem about tentacle and st5. Flings too rely on big guys and they only have tree's now, tree's being still the strongest big guys but also still having the rooting problem. the only thing I could see as a problem with the beast in stunty leeg is the tentacles... but its not that bad tough... |
_________________
"Life sucks. Get a F**king helmet, okay?"
- Denis Leary |
|
UrienRakarth
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
|
| Posted:
Nov 26, 2003 - 02:44 |
|
they have 2 chainsaw and have also ag 3  |
|
|
swilhelm73
Joined: Oct 06, 2003
|
| Posted:
Nov 26, 2003 - 03:12 |
|
Well, we should wait a bit before making any quick changes, but IMO if Nurgle Beasts go to st5, Nurglings should get mini-Rotters, say maybe add to the roster;
0-2 Stunted Beast 3 3 1 8 FA, Regen |
|
|
Pardus
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Nov 26, 2003 - 04:26 |
|
they are fine, nuff said. |
|
|
whitey
Joined: Sep 19, 2003
|
| Posted:
Nov 26, 2003 - 05:34 |
|
Tentacles is great in stunty league, if you can try to keep the other teams big guys away. |
|
|
SnakeSanders
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Nov 26, 2003 - 11:15 |
|
why not leave the beasts in stunty as they are? they arent serious rosters and wont be in the LRB ever so why change them... also i reckon that OLd WA should be kept in stunty only because it causes a lot more mayhem than what the new WA will do... because stunty is for strong big guys and hordes of little uns. but it aint for me to decide! |
|
|
petsku
Joined: Oct 11, 2003
|
| Posted:
Nov 26, 2003 - 11:23 |
|
Well i have a plus +st beast ...
but for snotlings tentacles + maybe m.block can do lots of damage.. but they are really stupid , so we have to wait douple roll and start thinking:pro or rsc , or claw... |
|
|
Clementus
Joined: Oct 01, 2003
|
| Posted:
Nov 26, 2003 - 11:33 |
|
nurglings fine, ive played twice just changes them slightly |
_________________
Warlord Clementus (of the Black Hand Tribe)
Monkey of the Moot!
Flings Rule! |
|
UrienRakarth
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2003 - 15:44 |
|
i've played some times and for me new beast are almost unuseful... (on a nurglings team) |
|
|
UrienRakarth
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2003 - 15:58 |
|
ok, now i know. New beasts are crap!  |
|
|
Zhluhur
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2003 - 15:43 |
|
The Beasts on nurgling teams are the best bigguys you can get! Foul App, and Tentacles! With the changes of the WA, they are the only
Bigguy who can have (and has from start on) tentacles and can move around as they want to. (If they pass the RS roll).
I think the nurglings are realy tough and good as they are. Hard to handle the ball, and the best bashers in Stunty. |
_________________
*-* Let the games begin! *-* |
|
Clementus
Joined: Oct 01, 2003
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2003 - 15:52 |
|
Fraid youve not been using them very well then, I find the new beasts really useful. And with the whole team on AV 7 the team doesnt need to rely on big guys. Nurglings, who have thick skull, AND regen are basically Stunty dwarves <not including Gnomes>. They can block there way SLOWLY down the field, and generally thinning down the enemy. |
_________________
Warlord Clementus (of the Black Hand Tribe)
Monkey of the Moot!
Flings Rule! |
|
|
|
Roster Tiers
Search
