CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 16:09 |
|
In [R]anked, a coach is taken out of the ranking, if he hasn`t played a ranked match for three month.
I want to suggest something similar for the Blackbox ranking. Whenever a coach hasn`t played the box for 1 month, he is taken out of the ranking until he plays again.
Currently in the top 10 there are 4 coaches with their last game longer than 1 month ago:
Flix - BWR 173.95 - last match: 6th of March
f0rd - BWR 171.01 - last match: 5th of April
Azure - BWR 169.30 - last match: 14th of March
SillySod - BWR 168.49 - last match: 10th of April |
|
|
Bill_Vestergaard
Joined: Dec 16, 2007
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 16:12 |
|
I would say three month just like in ranked, would be a good way to do it. But I play so little in blackbox that you shouldn't listen to me anyway. |
|
|
spelledaren
Joined: Mar 06, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 16:16 |
|
Seconded.
Circs suggestion that is. |
_________________ FUMBBL!
Last edited by spelledaren on %b %09, %2009 - %16:%Jul; edited 1 time in total |
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 16:16 |
|
|
Woodstock
Joined: Dec 11, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 16:27 |
|
|
Melmoth
Joined: May 05, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 16:29 |
|
koadah wrote: | Does anyone actually look at the list apart from you Circ?
Where do you find it? |
|
|
|
def909
Joined: Oct 25, 2005
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 16:31 |
|
koadah wrote: | Does anyone actually look at the list apart from you Circ?
Where do you find it? |
Yes, me And you find it on the blackbox central page http://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=blackbox
I never paid much attention to CR, but the Blackbox win/bash ratings seem to be a better indicator of a coaches skill (though it´ll never be really accurate).
As for removing coaches from the list who haven´t played [B] for months I´m all for it - the list should show the top _active_ coaches in that division. |
_________________ Don´t ask Nuffle for better dice, ask him to make you a better coach. |
|
SillySod
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 16:39 |
|
Sounds good to me. |
_________________ Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.
"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced." |
|
DukeTyrion
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 16:50 |
|
I agree.
I also like Bill's view that we echo the Ranked situation ... i.e. 3 Months. |
|
|
PurpleChest
Joined: Oct 25, 2003
|
sounds good, and 1 month feels about right. |
_________________ Barbarus hic ego sum, quia non intelligor illis -Ovid
I am a barbarian here because i am not understood by anyone |
|
Rijssiej
Joined: Jan 04, 2005
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 17:11 |
|
|
freak_in_a_frock
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 17:24 |
|
I agree with the original suggestion
Although personally i would like to see the ratings naturally shift back towards 150 by a small amount each month. That way to mantain a good BWR you would need to consistently play. |
|
|
Kraark
Joined: Dec 14, 2006
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 17:28 |
|
|
svemole
Joined: Feb 09, 2006
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 17:52 |
|
I agree but what happens when they do play a game? 1 game and they back on topp? |
|
|
Shraaaag
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jul 09, 2009 - 17:57 |
|
1 month is too short, sometime you go on an extended vacation, or maybe your computer gets fried. 3 months sounds better.
Top Lists should indeed be for active players. (there could be a seperate for all time top players). |
_________________
|
|
|