46 coaches online • Server time: 12:09
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post New Gnones vs Old Gn...goto Post Custom Icon, Portrai...goto Post All Star Bowl!
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Poll
Should coaches be removed from ranking if they haven`t played for more than 1 month?
No, they should never be removed.
14%
 14%  [ 17 ]
Yes, they should be removed after 1 month.
40%
 40%  [ 49 ]
Yes, but 1 month is too short, remove them at a later point. (see post)
42%
 42%  [ 51 ]
Yes, but 1 month is too long, remove them at an earlier point. (see post)
3%
 3%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 121


CircularLogic



Joined: Aug 22, 2003

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 16:09 Reply with quote Back to top

In [R]anked, a coach is taken out of the ranking, if he hasn`t played a ranked match for three month.

I want to suggest something similar for the Blackbox ranking. Whenever a coach hasn`t played the box for 1 month, he is taken out of the ranking until he plays again.

Currently in the top 10 there are 4 coaches with their last game longer than 1 month ago:
Flix - BWR 173.95 - last match: 6th of March
f0rd - BWR 171.01 - last match: 5th of April
Azure - BWR 169.30 - last match: 14th of March
SillySod - BWR 168.49 - last match: 10th of April
Bill_Vestergaard



Joined: Dec 16, 2007

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 16:12 Reply with quote Back to top

I would say three month just like in ranked, would be a good way to do it. But I play so little in blackbox that you shouldn't listen to me anyway.
spelledaren



Joined: Mar 06, 2004

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 16:16 Reply with quote Back to top

Seconded.

Circs suggestion that is.

_________________
FUMBBL!


Last edited by spelledaren on %b %09, %2009 - %16:%Jul; edited 1 time in total
koadah



Joined: Mar 30, 2005

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 16:16 Reply with quote Back to top

Does anyone actually look at the list apart from you Circ? Wink

Where do you find it?

_________________
Image
[SL] + Official Stunty teams. Progression KO. Old & new teams welcome. 29th May!
Woodstock



Joined: Dec 11, 2004

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 16:27 Reply with quote Back to top

http://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=blackbox
Melmoth



Joined: May 05, 2004

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 16:29 Reply with quote Back to top

koadah wrote:
Does anyone actually look at the list apart from you Circ? Wink

Where do you find it?


Very Happy
def909



Joined: Oct 25, 2005

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 16:31 Reply with quote Back to top

koadah wrote:
Does anyone actually look at the list apart from you Circ? Wink

Where do you find it?


Yes, me Wink And you find it on the blackbox central page http://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=blackbox
I never paid much attention to CR, but the Blackbox win/bash ratings seem to be a better indicator of a coaches skill (though it´ll never be really accurate).
As for removing coaches from the list who haven´t played [B] for months I´m all for it - the list should show the top _active_ coaches in that division.

_________________
Don´t ask Nuffle for better dice, ask him to make you a better coach.
SillySod



Joined: Oct 10, 2006

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 16:39 Reply with quote Back to top

Sounds good to me.

_________________
Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.

"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced."
DukeTyrion



Joined: Feb 18, 2004

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 16:50 Reply with quote Back to top

I agree.

I also like Bill's view that we echo the Ranked situation ... i.e. 3 Months.
PurpleChest



Joined: Oct 25, 2003

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 16:52
FUMBBL Staff
Reply with quote Back to top

sounds good, and 1 month feels about right.

_________________
Barbarus hic ego sum, quia non intelligor illis -Ovid
I am a barbarian here because i am not understood by anyone
Rijssiej



Joined: Jan 04, 2005

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 17:11 Reply with quote Back to top

Sounds good and I would like the same for the active player top lists.
freak_in_a_frock



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 17:24 Reply with quote Back to top

I agree with the original suggestion

Although personally i would like to see the ratings naturally shift back towards 150 by a small amount each month. That way to mantain a good BWR you would need to consistently play.
Kraark



Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 17:28 Reply with quote Back to top

Rijssiej wrote:
Sounds good and I would like the same for the active player top lists.


Seconded, really annoying to see players who hasent been in a game for years as active.

_________________
[url=http://forumbilder.se/images/b9220091130111202.jpg]Image[/URL]
svemole



Joined: Feb 09, 2006

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 17:52 Reply with quote Back to top

I agree but what happens when they do play a game? 1 game and they back on topp?
Shraaaag



Joined: Feb 15, 2004

Post   Posted: Jul 09, 2009 - 17:57 Reply with quote Back to top

1 month is too short, sometime you go on an extended vacation, or maybe your computer gets fried. 3 months sounds better.

Top Lists should indeed be for active players. (there could be a seperate for all time top players).

_________________
Image
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic