Lakrillo
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
|
  Posted:
Nov 16, 2010 - 15:37 |
|
I don't think all teams should be put into [L], but rather give the players a 2 weeks time to push a button to "transfer to L". The teams that dont take this offer would be wiped and at a later date get to reuse the teamname as Christer offered. |
|
|
Olesh
Joined: Jun 24, 2010
|
  Posted:
Nov 16, 2010 - 16:02 |
|
Lakrillo wrote: | I don't think all teams should be put into [L], but rather give the players a 2 weeks time to push a button to "transfer to L". The teams that dont take this offer would be wiped and at a later date get to reuse the teamname as Christer offered. |
I could totally dig this kind of decision, but I've also made my peace with the FFB teams being wiped. It was frustrating for a period, but now I just want it to be gotten over with because nobody (that I play with) is going to play FFB until after the wipe. |
|
|
regn
Joined: Sep 07, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 16, 2010 - 18:08 |
|
Lakrillo wrote: | I don't think all teams should be put into [L], but rather give the players a 2 weeks time to push a button to "transfer to L". The teams that dont take this offer would be wiped and at a later date get to reuse the teamname as Christer offered. |
This would be great |
|
|
magistern
Joined: Jun 24, 2010
|
  Posted:
Nov 17, 2010 - 02:19 |
|
Yes, please can we get some confirmation as to whether this is possible? Or some reason why it isn't? |
|
|
strikereternal
Joined: Oct 02, 2009
|
  Posted:
Nov 17, 2010 - 06:20 |
|
I'd like to second (actually fifth, I think) Lakrillo's suggestion. It seems to me that it wouldn't require much work on the part of the staff to transfer these FFB teams to [L] either. I don't see what is wrong with that as a solution, as it would satisfy all parties involved. |
|
|
svemole
Joined: Feb 09, 2006
|
  Posted:
Nov 18, 2010 - 18:05 |
|
Some realy bad decisions in this article imo. Keeping the lrb4 to split up community and deleting existing ffb teams arent things I support. |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
  Posted:
Nov 18, 2010 - 18:12 |
|
svemole wrote: | Some realy bad decisions in this article imo. Keeping the lrb4 to split up community and deleting existing ffb teams arent things I support. |
It'll be okay, the only person left playing LRB4 will be zombie 69 anyway |
_________________
Last edited by Garion on %b %18, %2010 - %18:%Nov; edited 1 time in total |
|
peikko
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 18, 2010 - 18:22 |
|
Garion wrote: | It'll be okay, teh only person left playing LRB$ will be zombie 69 anyway |
OMG! Finally a bb you can play for real money? |
|
|
strikereternal
Joined: Oct 02, 2009
|
  Posted:
Nov 19, 2010 - 19:30 |
|
svemole wrote: | Some realy bad decisions in this article imo. Keeping the lrb4 to split up community and deleting existing ffb teams arent things I support. |
Agreed, and bump. |
|
|
magistern
Joined: Jun 24, 2010
|
  Posted:
Nov 19, 2010 - 20:26 |
|
yeah, being talked down to for making reasonable requests isn't my idea of closure. |
|
|
WhatBall
Joined: Aug 21, 2008
|
  Posted:
Nov 19, 2010 - 20:28 |
|
+1 for beta teams to [L]. |
|
|
Mossbeard
Joined: Jul 03, 2005
|
  Posted:
Nov 19, 2010 - 20:47 |
|
All good news in the article, I am happy to read that things are moving along.
I can't believe how many people are whining about keeping beta testing teams that everyone knew would be deleted.
Hopefully reason prevails and they are all deleted and not relegated to some silly League graveyard to rot.
I hope that Blackbox gets to move to FFB first, I am looking forward to using those teams that have been stuck in a dead division for so long.
Would be nice if the Blackbox teams get started first and they can become the norm and get people who might not try Blackbox otherwise to try it and then they will never leave.
Keeping a LRB4 division is a good idea, I don't think it will split the community as not many people will keep playing LRB4 and most that do will play FFB also.
Only thing I think should be done differently is Ranked and Blackbox should be combined into the same division, would be nice to have the option of gamefinder or a scheduler without having to use different teams. I have never understood why people think this would ruin either Blackbox or Ranked. |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
  Posted:
Nov 19, 2010 - 20:58 |
|
magistern wrote: | yeah, being talked down to for making reasonable requests isn't my idea of closure. |
who promised you closure? |
|
|
maysrill
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
|
  Posted:
Nov 19, 2010 - 21:20 |
|
Mossbeard wrote: |
Only thing I think should be done differently is Ranked and Blackbox should be combined into the same division, would be nice to have the option of gamefinder or a scheduler without having to use different teams. I have never understood why people think this would ruin either Blackbox or Ranked. |
THIS. More options for my team to play games = more games. |
|
|
shadow46x2
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 19, 2010 - 22:53 |
|
pythrr wrote: | magistern wrote: | yeah, being talked down to for making reasonable requests isn't my idea of closure. |
who promised you closure? |
it's that whole "entitlement" thing again
--j |
_________________
origami wrote: | There is no god but Nuffle, and Shadow is his prophet. |
|
|
|