26 coaches online • Server time: 05:19
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Vamps win another ma...goto Post 1150 - OWA TT Tourna...goto Post SWL Season 100!
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
dertre



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: May 10, 2004 - 13:56 Reply with quote Back to top

From the rules

Stakes
After a block - +3 to AV rolls against Khemri, Necromantic or Vampire and +1 to AV rolls against all others. Penalty roll: 10+


i plpayed a dwarf opponent who hired this star to play against undeads team and he was getting a +3 to av rolls. Seems undeads are not included (perhaps they should), else it's a bug Wink
Printzlau



Joined: Nov 01, 2003

Post   Posted: May 10, 2004 - 14:01 Reply with quote Back to top

It is not a bug. Stakes give a +3 modifier against all kinds of undead.
Ewnam



Joined: Mar 18, 2004

Post   Posted: May 11, 2004 - 10:47 Reply with quote Back to top

As Printzlau says.
Quote:
From Living Rulebook III
Stakes - Zara carries a supply of stakes on her for the specific reason of banishing the hated Undead. The stakes give her a +3 when attempting to roll for the armour against any member of a Khemri, Necromantic, Undead, or Vampire team and/or against Count Luthor Von Drakenborg (you must still make a Block first). If she blocks a player from any other team, then the stakeis somewhat less effective, only giving a +1 against the Armour roll. The Stakes are considered illegal/secret weapons and as such come with a Penalty roll of 10+.
dertre



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: May 11, 2004 - 11:30 Reply with quote Back to top

ok Wink quoted the fummbl ruleset but it was obvious thx everyone
gregory_n_white



Joined: Jan 05, 2006

Post   Posted: Sep 13, 2009 - 12:13 Reply with quote Back to top

I just used stakes on the Count adn didnt seem to get +3. Anyone seen this before?

Bell-Harbour Buccaneers , Choose a block die.
POW
Count von Drakenborg is knocked over.
Player pushed to (8, 0)
STAKES used on armor roll.
(3, 3) + 1, (0, 0) + 0, 0: Count von Drakenborg has been knocked prone.
RC



Joined: Sep 22, 2005

Post   Posted: Sep 13, 2009 - 12:16 Reply with quote Back to top

I knew that Ramthut doesnt suffer from stakes, does the count have the "undead" prefix among his skills?

_________________
"Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar."
Woodstock



Joined: Dec 11, 2004

Post   Posted: Sep 13, 2009 - 12:27 Reply with quote Back to top

Nope.
Khudzlin



Joined: May 24, 2007

Post   Posted: Sep 14, 2009 - 11:23 Reply with quote Back to top

imo, it's not a client bug, but something that could probably be fixed FUMBBLside (adding Undead to Ramtut's and the Count's skill lists)

the Count is specifically mentioned in the rules about stakes (and the Vampire Lord, who is supposed to be identical to the Count, does have Undead) and Ramtut plays only for teams mentioned there (Khemri and Necro)
Grin



Joined: Mar 08, 2005

Post   Posted: Sep 14, 2009 - 11:54 Reply with quote Back to top

Yep, Stakes should be fixed vs. Ramtut! It is just absurd that one of the toughest mummies is not affected! Smile
Thariama



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Jan 21, 2012 - 17:51 Reply with quote Back to top

yes, stakes are not functional that way in stunty too
pythrr



Joined: Mar 07, 2006

Post   Posted: Jan 21, 2012 - 17:56 Reply with quote Back to top

well, loads of things aren't functional in stunty.

_________________
Image
Image
uuni



Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Post   Posted: Jan 22, 2012 - 12:52 Reply with quote Back to top

Should this thread get staked?
Woodstock



Joined: Dec 11, 2004

Post   Posted: Jan 22, 2012 - 13:10 Reply with quote Back to top

Necro-lock
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic