JackassRampant
Joined: Feb 26, 2011
|
 Posted:
Feb 01, 2016 - 21:06 |
 
|
The only problem, Joost, is that all Right Stuff players lack G access, so Pro is a double. |
_________________
Lude enixe, obliviscatur timor. |
|
Joost
Joined: Mar 17, 2014
|
| Posted:
Feb 01, 2016 - 21:15 |
|
Good point, thanks. But I think I'd still consider it on a designated OTT player, such as the gobbo in a Chaos Pact Team or a Halfling. Mind, I only play friendly games and like the fluff aspect, so I tend to ignore a too high TV. |
|
|
Arktoris
Joined: Feb 16, 2004
|
| Posted:
Feb 01, 2016 - 21:28 |
|
pro is also good for dauntless, frenzy, fullbacks, and legends. |
_________________
Hail to Manowar! The latest charioteer to DIE for bloodbowl! - Slain, by Ghor Oggaz |
|
PainState
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
|
| Posted:
Feb 01, 2016 - 21:33 |
|
Here is the case against PRO when we talk about blocking.
Why not take FRENZY then? It is a automatic PRO reroll BUT with the negative of you push back on the first block and now we enter the land of uncertainty on the second block. You could go from a 2DB to a -2DB on the second. Also you could end up on a sideline for a nice juicy shove.
Frenzy > Pro if you do not care about the great unkown of the follow up block. |
_________________
Comish of the:  |
|
BillBrasky
Joined: Feb 15, 2005
|
| Posted:
Feb 01, 2016 - 22:24 |
|
This one time at band camp I took pro, and it was REALLY funny.
Oh yeah, frenzy is good too. This is a non-sense issue I suppose. |
|
|
Angmarred
Joined: Feb 28, 2015
|
| Posted:
Feb 01, 2016 - 22:41 |
|
| Joost wrote: | | How about Pro on a Right Stuff player to help with landing after TTM? For a desperate last turn Touchdown, when all TRR's are gone. Also useful for that extra dodge necessary for that touchdonw, or the catch. Sounds pretty useful to me, but interested what others think. |
Pro is a doubles skill for all those players. Way way down on the list. |
|
|
thoralf
Joined: Mar 06, 2008
|
| Posted:
Feb 02, 2016 - 03:09 |
|
| PainState wrote: | | Why not take FRENZY then? It is a automatic PRO reroll BUT with the negative of you push back on the first block and now we enter the land of uncertainty on the second block. |
You beat me to it. However, I can respond to what follows:
| PainState wrote: | | It is a automatic PRO reroll BUT with the negative of you push back on the first block and now we enter the land of uncertainty on the second block. |
Which is why Nuffle created Guardspam.
So Pro on Norse, and Frenzy on Dorfs for the offensive crew.
Or Stand Firm. SF would be the opposite to Pro. It seldom fails, and is purely positional. Fend is more defensive.
Which leads me to this question: why not Fend/Pro on Norsemen? |
|
|
PainState
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
|
| Posted:
Feb 02, 2016 - 03:31 |
|
| BillBrasky wrote: | This one time at band camp I took pro, and it was REALLY funny.
Oh yeah, frenzy is good too. This is a non-sense issue I suppose. |
Well, is it?
The WMD are known for 2 things.
#1 laying out pixels into the CAS box
#2 their coach is a notorious CPOMB whore.
SO
What if?
The WMD did an experiment over a 100 matches.
They strive to take PRO on their CPOMB monstrosities at 76 SPP skill up.
Would your rep as a pixel reaper double? triple? or stay the same? |
_________________
Comish of the: |
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Feb 02, 2016 - 03:32 |
|
| thoralf wrote: |
Which leads me to this question: why not Fend/Pro on Norsemen? |
Don't live long enough. |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Feb 02, 2016 - 04:00 |
|
| mrt1212 wrote: | | thoralf wrote: |
Which leads me to this question: why not Fend/Pro on Norsemen? |
Don't live long enough. |
because there are a billion better choices? |
_________________
|
|
PainState
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
|
| Posted:
Feb 02, 2016 - 04:05 |
|
| pythrr wrote: | | mrt1212 wrote: | | thoralf wrote: |
Which leads me to this question: why not Fend/Pro on Norsemen? |
Don't live long enough. |
because there are a billion better choices? |
A billion?
Please, give me wisdom what is a billion times better.
I thought DirtyPlayer was good.
Now Iam not sure.
Now I feel Iam missing out on the billion times better skill for a norse lino.
 |
_________________
Comish of the: |
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Feb 02, 2016 - 04:08 |
|
| pythrr wrote: | | mrt1212 wrote: | | thoralf wrote: |
Which leads me to this question: why not Fend/Pro on Norsemen? |
Don't live long enough. |
because there are a billion better choices? |
I mean, after fend, dp, kick, tackle...
But still you've got enough players on the rest of your team hopefully making key blitzes and blocks that you'd have to prioritize blocks with the pro to get milage out of it. But if you've got 4 MBs with Norse you're not going to do that to open the game most the time. |
|
|
PainState
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
|
| Posted:
Feb 02, 2016 - 04:13 |
|
| mrt1212 wrote: | | pythrr wrote: | | mrt1212 wrote: | | thoralf wrote: |
Which leads me to this question: why not Fend/Pro on Norsemen? |
Don't live long enough. |
because there are a billion better choices? |
I mean, after fend, dp, kick, tackle...
But still you've got enough players on the rest of your team hopefully making key blitzes and blocks that you'd have to prioritize blocks with the pro to get milage out of it. But if you've got 4 MBs with Norse you're not going to do that to open the game most the time. |
Sir, you are trying to talk sense to some dude who lives in a tree in the pacific northwest.
There is a reason for his insanity and it is not because he lacks logic. |
_________________
Comish of the: |
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Feb 02, 2016 - 04:17 |
|
I wish I could wave to him from my tree. I'm a sad ape  |
|
|
thoralf
Joined: Mar 06, 2008
|
| Posted:
Feb 02, 2016 - 05:01 |
|
| mrt1212 wrote: | | Don't live long enough. |
I was unclear: you mix Fend for defenders and Pro for attackers. |
|
|
|
|
Exempt teams
Search
