Dominik
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
|
 Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 22:42 |
 
|
Would it be possible to let both coaches select their MVP's simultaneously? I don't see the point in having to wait for my opponent's decision and vice versa. |
|
|
m0gw41
Joined: Jun 12, 2012
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 22:46 |
|
This is the kind of thing that I am sure would have been done if it was easy so I am going out on a limb here and going to say no. Aren't all other decisions in the game (inducements etc) are taken sequentially as well? |
_________________
 |
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 22:47 |
|
| Dominik wrote: | | Would it be possible to let both coaches select their MVP's simultaneously? I don't see the point in having to wait for my opponent's decision and vice versa. |
What other systems in the client have simultaneous interaction from both coaches outside of marking players which only renders on the individual's client?
I have left you a breadcrumb that 'the point' might not be a conscious choice but a technological limitation baked into the client  |
|
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 22:48 |
|
| m0gw41 wrote: | | This is the kind of thing that I am sure would have been done if it was easy so I am going out on a limb here and going to say no. Aren't all other decisions in the game (inducements etc) are taken sequentially as well? |
Ha beat me by a minute. Yes, if every interaction bar player marking is sequential it might suggest there's a reason for that. |
|
|
licker
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 22:54 |
|
I didn't realize it wasn't simultaneous.
I guess I've always gone first...
Probably because I always win |
|
|
Dominik
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 23:01 |
|
| licker wrote: | I didn't realize it wasn't simultaneous.
I guess I've always gone first...
Probably because I always win |
I won my last game and was second to choose. |
|
|
JimmyFantastic
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 23:02 |
|
Dominik complaining about having to wait is one of the funniest things ever! |
_________________
Pull down the veil - actively bad for the hobby! |
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 23:04 |
|
Even better, may the coaches' MVP nominations be indipendent? So if my opponent leaves before selecting the MVP the game doesn't get stuck. |
|
|
Dominik
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 23:04 |
|
| JimmyFantastic wrote: | | Dominik complaining about having to wait is one of the funniest things ever! |
Well, rules say you have to wait up to 4 minutes per turn for your opponent. There are no rules for the order of selection of the MVPs, if I am correct. You see the difference? |
|
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 23:09 |
|
| MattDakka wrote: | | Even better, may the coaches' MVP nominations be indipendent? So if my opponent leaves before selecting the MVP the game doesn't get stuck. |
"Plz don't leave before selecting your MVP" -MattDakka on Turn 8, 2nd half. |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 23:24 |
|
| Dominik wrote: | | JimmyFantastic wrote: | | Dominik complaining about having to wait is one of the funniest things ever! |
Well, rules say you have to wait up to 4 minutes per turn for your opponent. There are no rules for the order of selection of the MVPs, if I am correct. You see the difference? |
yes. one involves 16X4 minutes; the other 30 seconds. |
_________________
 |
|
Dominik
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 23:28 |
|
| pythrr wrote: | | Dominik wrote: | | JimmyFantastic wrote: | | Dominik complaining about having to wait is one of the funniest things ever! |
Well, rules say you have to wait up to 4 minutes per turn for your opponent. There are no rules for the order of selection of the MVPs, if I am correct. You see the difference? |
yes. one involves 16X4 minutes; the other 30 seconds. |
As if my suggestion is completely unworldly and useless. Why do complain about my game speed in this thread? |
|
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 23:31 |
|
Why do you refuse to laugh at yourself for the juxtaposition of a quantum complaint from a quantum thief? |
|
|
Rabe
Joined: Jun 06, 2009
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 23:33 |
|
| MattDakka wrote: | | Even better, may the coaches' MVP nominations be indipendent? So if my opponent leaves before selecting the MVP the game doesn't get stuck. |
Just happened to me in a tournament game, I guess my opponent wasn't aware of it and hasn't had much experience with the new MVP thing - as with FUMBBL in general. I don't blame him at all - I just hope he comes back soon!
Maybe there could be a popup window saying "Please wait until you opponent has made his MVP nominations." - just like with rerolling winnings, waiting for the opponent's decision on apo/skill usage etc.? |
_________________
.
 |
|
Antithesisoftime
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
|
| Posted:
Mar 23, 2017 - 23:46 |
|
| Rabe wrote: |
Maybe there could be a popup window saying "Please wait until you opponent has made his MVP nominations." - just like with rerolling winnings, waiting for the opponent's decision on apo/skill usage etc.? |
I second this idea |
|
|
|
|
Gnomes are trash
Search
