32 coaches online • Server time: 00:42
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post FUMBBL HAIKU'Sgoto Post Exempt teamsgoto Post Gnomes are trash
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Vurner_Vinckler



Joined: Feb 06, 2005

Post   Posted: Aug 18, 2005 - 20:05 Reply with quote Back to top

As one of the 2vs2 guys who ruined at least only the strigoyan top10,
I also hope, that there is a way to ban them from the top10.
Even the owner of the hated DJRabauke doesnt want him in the top10 !
He`s proud of his player, and as he knows his qualities, he doesnt need to compete with the real top-stars who face fulgrown teams. Nearly a whole different game.


Btw. 2vs2 gets boring.
BiggieB



Joined: Feb 19, 2005

Post   Posted: Aug 18, 2005 - 20:58 Reply with quote Back to top

I´m in tis pure bullox
DeathKittie



Joined: Aug 03, 2005

Post   Posted: Aug 18, 2005 - 21:05 Reply with quote Back to top

Get rid, I say.
BunnyPuncher



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Aug 18, 2005 - 21:09 Reply with quote Back to top

Dont get rid of them.. let people have fun however they want.. just gut unranked, stunty, div-x and ladder out of the top tens and DYK unless people explicity ask for them.

_________________
Image
xen7ric



Joined: Jan 13, 2005

Post   Posted: Aug 18, 2005 - 21:55 Reply with quote Back to top

OK so we've banned short teams ()2x2, 4x4 etc), Stunty, Ranked, teams and with DP.

I propose banning Ladder because there are too few teams to accurately represent Bloodbowl. So guys? What's next?
Mezir



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Aug 18, 2005 - 22:11 Reply with quote Back to top

BunnyPuncher wrote:
The did you knows are already ruined by crap stunty records.

It is about time someone made the did you knows and top 10s default to Ranked only.


Seconded.

Other than that, I could care less how people play in U/S.

_________________
Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day; set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
SnakeSanders



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Aug 18, 2005 - 22:11 Reply with quote Back to top

BunnyPuncher wrote:
The did you knows are already ruined by crap stunty records.

It is about time someone made the did you knows and top 10s default to Ranked only.


Even though enjoyment was brill, and a legend, and one of my favourite players, from a cool coach, he was in the day of the broken PO when he got +5 to his AV rolls, and he would be top if it was limited to ranked teams only.

Just trying to say that it would be difficult to emulate that in this day and age, but where do you draw the line? Smile

Not picking on you BP, I agree that 1vs1 records shouldnt stand, just look at the MVPs!!!

IMHO, the best blocker about is lightning roots Smile
SnakeSanders



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Aug 18, 2005 - 22:13 Reply with quote Back to top

add my name to the list too Wink
vanGorn



Joined: Feb 24, 2004

Post   Posted: Aug 18, 2005 - 22:48 Reply with quote Back to top

Is the "Did you know?" so important for you? Ok.It adds to the fluff, but what's that against the fluff you can add to your teams by bios, portraits and team badges. Many coaches, especially in ranked, never upload a single badge, or write a bio for teams or players. I won't expect them in being interested in stats, too.

_________________
Gimme a pint of fungus beer!
Then we will climb the ladder.
Image
sk8bcn



Joined: Apr 13, 2004

Post   Posted: Aug 19, 2005 - 00:11 Reply with quote Back to top

well this is my contribution to the controversy

_________________
Join NL Raises from the Ashes
peikko



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Aug 19, 2005 - 00:19 Reply with quote Back to top

Trying to restrict what kinda tournaments people like to play in unranked is just something I dont quite get. Selecting specific division in top10 lists is just one selection away, if youre too lazy to do that, you can blame just yourself. What I do agree is that did you knows would be better limited on ranked only, althought one can always speculate what value top lists even in ranked have as some of the top stars are not genuinly born, but from teams that sole purpose is to bring that one player forward.
AFK_Eagle



Joined: Mar 12, 2004

Post   Posted: Aug 19, 2005 - 00:21 Reply with quote Back to top

At least you know the 1v1 players won't be tops of the passing/intercepting categories...

_________________
Listen to Eagle! Eagle is good, Eagle is wise!
Founder of the E.L.F.--These elves will play anybody!
chunky04



Joined: Aug 11, 2003

Post   Posted: Aug 19, 2005 - 03:47 Reply with quote Back to top

I'll join. I don't give a toss about any of the top 10s or DYK (for the record, I tend to think ranked is far too open to properly do such things - proper league style play only I say), I'll just join because I think anything less than 11 on 11 is rubbish.

_________________
chunky - you are eloquence on legs
Lord_Splutticus



Joined: Aug 03, 2003

Post   Posted: Aug 19, 2005 - 03:54 Reply with quote Back to top

uber wrote:
I want them banned from the record books, that's for sure !! It's a travesty to the achievements of the Legends that have worked long and hard to achieve greatness. I think these teams should get their own divisions and be blocked from the "Did you know"s and the overall Top10. I don't think people should be stopped from playing those games altogether, but it's a different game and their achievements belong in a category of their own.


There is only 1 true record-book...

_________________
Recordopedia Spluttanica
Larson Hall of Fame
PurpleChest



Joined: Oct 25, 2003

Post   Posted: Aug 19, 2005 - 04:10
FUMBBL Staff
Reply with quote Back to top

totally in favour of a R only DYK? and top tens.

As for less number squads. Why not give them a 'novelty nonsense' division of their own?
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic