| Poll |
| Is the foul in this situation a good play |
| Yes, nothing wrong with a foul. I would foul too |
|
63% |
[ 162 ] |
| No, a foul here is overkill. You will surely score the run and win. No sense in hurting the team further. |
|
15% |
[ 39 ] |
| Foul away, but be ready for your opp to be mad at you. |
|
21% |
[ 55 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 256 |
|
ex-convict
Joined: Jun 28, 2005
|
 Posted:
Jul 11, 2006 - 02:04 |
 
|
Since it is in the tactical sense, it's fair even though the beastman has little chance of actualy pulling off the blitz. Then again, crazy rolls have been known to occur.
Fouling with 4 players left doesnt seem right, but in this situation I'll take it as an exception. |
_________________
Part of the NCBB and the NBFL.
Don't drop the soap. |
|
Mr_Launcher
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jul 11, 2006 - 11:07 |
|
Let's say you hadn't fouled, and your opponent had succeeded those 6% dodges and blitz etc, and managed to tie the game. How do you think he would have felt? Great for tieing against the odds, or bad because he took advantage of your "friendlyness"? I would say the latter. So, for the sake of your opponent, foul! |
|
|
Mr_Launcher
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jul 11, 2006 - 11:11 |
|
| Longshanks wrote: | | I don't like being fouled and losing players in that way. |
Do you also dislike being blocked and losing players in that way? Because it really doesn't matter how you loose your players. They're dead either way. |
|
|
sk8bcn
Joined: Apr 13, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jul 11, 2006 - 13:24 |
|
| Mr_Launcher wrote: | | Let's say you hadn't fouled, and your opponent had succeeded those 6% dodges and blitz etc, and managed to tie the game. How do you think he would have felt? Great for tieing against the odds, or bad because he took advantage of your "friendlyness"? I would say the latter. So, for the sake of your opponent, foul! |
me at least wouldn't care that much. |
_________________
Join NL Raises from the Ashes |
|
|
|
| |
SWL Season 100!
Search
