sk8bcn
Joined: Apr 13, 2004
|
 Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 13:51 |
 
|
I d like to see CR moving naturally through the average result of 150.
Something like -0.1 pt of CR every 2 weeks if CR>150
-.1 if CR<150
That way, you couldn't simply hit a target CR then stop R without slowly dropping down. |
_________________
Join NL Raises from the Ashes |
|
Tophat
Joined: Jun 01, 2006
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 13:51 |
|
For what purpose ? |
_________________
Glory Daze-Dying for Glory since 30th July 2006- Back Now |
|
SideshowBob
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 13:52 |
|
| sk8bcn wrote: | I d like to see CR moving naturally through the average result of 150.
Something like -0.1 pt of CR every 2 weeks if CR>150
-.1 if CR<150
That way, you couldn't simply hit a target CR then stop R without slowly dropping down. |
Actually a pretty nice idea. I like it, although i fear it might affect my CR a lot! |
|
|
Webbe
Joined: Aug 13, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 13:54 |
|
So that you can't just hit a high CR and then quit playing, instead you would have to maintain it.
I like it. |
|
|
PandaPower
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 13:57 |
|
On Warcraft III there is experience decay (Like CR), but it only kicks in if you don't play a game in a certain amount of time, depending on your level. This could be altered to fit the CR system, but the variation between CR and time allowed between now and your next match is a bit much to ask really. |
|
|
Tophat
Joined: Jun 01, 2006
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 13:57 |
|
I dislike it simply because if someone dosent play as often as other people there not aloud to be concidered a "good coach" or if someone takes a break .
I always thought that CR was "supposed" to imply how good a ccoach you where rather than if you are particularly active or not . |
_________________
Glory Daze-Dying for Glory since 30th July 2006- Back Now |
|
Webbe
Joined: Aug 13, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 13:59 |
|
If someone doesn't play as often as they used to they are not as good a coach (trust me, playing skill decay too). |
|
|
ProPain
Joined: May 31, 2006
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 14:04 |
|
I could use that system. at 0.1 per 2 weeks. I would need to stop playing for approximeatly 200 weeks to reach CR 150 again... oh how it would feel to be an average coach instead of a below average one.. I dream wistfully of the day! |
|
|
Optihut
Joined: Dec 16, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 14:05 |
|
|
PandaPower
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 14:15 |
|
| Tophat wrote: | I dislike it simply because if someone dosent play as often as other people there not aloud to be concidered a "good coach" or if someone takes a break .
I always thought that CR was "supposed" to imply how good a ccoach you where rather than if you are particularly active or not . |
1. As Webbe said, if you haven't played in a while your skills are bound to have decreased.
2. If you don't play very often, say once a week, this won't affect you if you have the delay before the CR starts to drop. |
|
|
Vero
Joined: Dec 30, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 14:21 |
|
Not everyone plays only on fumbbl. |
|
|
SideshowBob
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 14:26 |
|
| Vero wrote: | | Not everyone plays only on fumbbl. |
Ah so fumbbl should track peoples games on other sites and IRL games too? Or what do you mean? |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 14:29 |
|
/cheer
I like it but 0.1 every two weeks probably isn't enough if you want CR to be a competitive thing.
It'll probably add to the cherrypicking though. 
| Tophat wrote: | I dislike it simply because if someone dosent play as often as other people there not aloud to be concidered a "good coach" or if someone takes a break .
I always thought that CR was "supposed" to imply how good a ccoach you where rather than if you are particularly active or not . |
You can make that back in a single game even if you only draw. If people are not playing in [R] they they can't be that bothered about CR. If you have not played for months it seems right that your rating should fall a bit.
"But what have you done lately man?" |
_________________
O[L]C 2016 Swiss! - April ---- All Star Bowl - Teams of Stars - 2 more teams needed |
|
Tophat
Joined: Jun 01, 2006
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 14:30 |
|
| PandaPower wrote: | | Tophat wrote: | I dislike it simply because if someone dosent play as often as other people there not aloud to be concidered a "good coach" or if someone takes a break .
I always thought that CR was "supposed" to imply how good a ccoach you where rather than if you are particularly active or not . |
1. As Webbe said, if you haven't played in a while your skills are bound to have decreased.
2. If you don't play very often, say once a week, this won't affect you if you have the delay before the CR starts to drop. |
it will still effect you . Your cr wont go up as often if you only play 2-3 games a week
i.e bob players 10 games a week ,winning all 10 these all add to his CR
jim plays 10 games a month , winning all 10 these all add to his CR .
at the end of jims 10 games he is .2 worse in Cr than bob . Why should this be ? |
|
|
Aino
Joined: Jul 15, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jul 24, 2006 - 14:31 |
|
| SideshowBob wrote: | | Vero wrote: | | Not everyone plays only on fumbbl. |
Ah so fumbbl should track peoples games on other sites and IRL games too? Or what do you mean? |
 It probably means that some people actually still own a copy of the boardgame and enjoy dusting the figurines to play it once in a while... 
Aino |
Last edited by Aino on %b %24, %2006 - %14:%Jul; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
Gnomes are trash
Search
