Recent Forum Topics ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
SR version 2.0
The SR Rankings is the mathematical method of ranking FUMBBL teams and coaches based on their performances on official competitive win-aimed tournaments.
The SR Rankings are published in Reports after each Monday 8:00 AM (server time) when there are at least one tournament entered to or exited from the system. Reports are grouped by FUMBBL Years. A FUMBBL Year ends when a new FUMBBL Cup result enters the system and the previous FUMBBL Cup result exits. Year-end standings deserve more attention.
A regular tournament enters into the system in the next Report after it finishes and remains there for 52 calendar weeks by default or at least until its year ends. The tournaments below are exceptional as they may get replaced in the system by the next tournament of the same kind. If that does not happen, points earned on these tournaments remain in the system for 78 calendar weeks.
Major qualifiers move along with their main tournament. XFL Qualifiers are exceptional and are treated as Minor tournaments.
The system ensures that all regular tournaments are included in either of the year end Reports. As the special tournaments provide what could be considered as a title, the system ensures that in a given time only one champion exist per these tournaments. In rare cases this could make some results excluded from the year end reports which mostly threatens the XFL Qualifiers which are drawn in a random order for each season.
Special tournaments are usually shown with bold while thise which are not part of the year end rankings are shown with bolditalic typeface.
Tournaments yield points based on their rank, level, format, number of teams, and based on the performance of the team/coach.
Format: SR has two tournament formats: Elimination (E) and Non-elimination (N). Knockout and King of the Hill tournaments are Elimination format tournaments, while Swiss and Round-robin tournaments are Non-Elimination format tournaments.
Rank: There are three ranks: Major (MA), Minor (MI), and Major Qualifier (QU). Tournament ranks should be obvious except for XFL Qualifiers which are considered as Minor tournaments. Currently the XFL Masters Groups are considered as Major Qualifiers, while the XFL Masters Final is a Major tournament. Historically there were XFL Masters which were Minor tournaments.
Level: A Level 1 tournament has no qualifiers while a level 2 tournaments have level 1 qualifiers etc. Note that XFL Qualifiers are considered as Level 1 MI tournaments, XFL Masters Groups are Level 2 QU tournaments, while the XFL Masters Final is a Level 3 MA tournament.
Number of Teams: This is the number of non-filler teams in round 1 of the schedule of the tournament. The point allocation rules are set for ranges of these numbers, eg. a tournament with 14 teams may fit to a point allocation rule set for 13–16 teams. Not requiresd for Non-elimination tournaments.
Performance: Performances are handled differently for the two formats. Concessions, forfeits, and dropouts are punished. All tournaments yield a small amount of initial points even if the participant loses all matches. This is not only an incentive for participation but also to play the match without conceding as a first round forfeit/dropout/concession takes away these points and result a zero point performance. On top of that, these performances have priority over others in taking slots and may easily displace better performances (see SR Points section below.)
In the Tournaments pages both the tournament categories and the points are shown in solid forms. For examlpe E/MI/1/17-24 means an Elimination, Minor, level 1 tournament with 17 to 24 teams while N/QU/1 means a Non-elimination level 1 Major Qualifier. The points of these type of tournaments are shown as 13 * 17-34-68-114-190 and 4 * 15/8/1 * 15 respectively.
Teams and coaches may not get all the points they earned. Earned points which are excluded from their SR Points are called as Wasted Points.
Points are wasted because no vacant slots are remained for them possibly because those slots were taken by better performances. Once a good performance gets out of the system then a formerly wasted performance can easily fill the vacancy.
If a coach applied with multiple teams to a given tournament (whether these teams applied to different qualifiers or not) then the least of the points are divided equally among the teams fractions rounded down. The points from the better perfomances are completely removed from the system and not even shown as Wasted Points.
For example if a coach applied with two teams for the same tournament and they earn 100 and 36 points then both teams will be credited with 18 SR Points and the coach will be creadited with 36 for that tournament. If any of the teams is conceded, forfeited or dropped out then it applies to the coach in the sense of the Coach Rankings.
Team and Coach rankings have different slot rules and these rules changed and may will change over time. A slot rule in effect determines what kind of slots groups are, what kind of tournament performances they accept, how many slots they contain, which order they are checked, and what slot group they pass those performances for which they had no vacant slots.
SR has the following Slot Groups:
Table 3 shows the number of slots for the three groups by time. Note that the sum of slots for the Coach Rankings is 18 while for the Team rankings it is 9. Would all of these slots in the R group would mean that Coach Rankings would be calculated by the best 18 tournament results regardless of the ranks of those tournaments. FC and MA slots are in fact defined for restrictions which means that not taking part in FUMBBL Cup and some majors results a disadvantage in the rankings as those slots then contribute no points to the final SR Points.
Note that the current rules are in the last row. For details regarding the dates of Table 3, see Appendix A.
To get the SR Points of a coach or team, one must know the order of slot allocation. The exact method is explained next.
As tiebreakers, points are compared in decreasion order. If all points are equal then we apply no more tiebreakers.