Britnoth
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 02:53 |
|
After reading the news item, I didn't consider entering this years warpstone. Now after spectating a game (which was really one sided, no shock there) I see the news item was really misleading it isnt following any KotH rules at all?
It is just a straight unscheduled knock out tourney like the FA cup is.
King of the hill (game)
Quote: | and where winning can only be achieved at the cost of displacing the previous winner. |
I was expecting it to be some challenge league format where you challenge/are drawn against someone with a similar record like in a swiss system (which fumbbl has used in a previous major tourney).
Oh and I see this team are in a group with only 10 opponents, rather than 15... as if they needed any further help. |
|
|
Reisender
Joined: Sep 29, 2007
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 03:01 |
|
the name is misleading. king of the hill is christers name for a ko tourney where every round is drawn after the round before finishs (not allowing planning ahead so much with money, stars etc.)
and with all the respect to the eaters (they are still the best shot to win the group) they have picked up enough injuries to make it a little more interesting |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 09:40 |
|
I think the concept you were looking for was employed in this group.. Unfortunatelly, the workload to admin such a league was a bit too high for me alone, so it eventually died. |
|
|
Melmoth
Joined: May 05, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 10:11 |
|
Britnoth wrote: |
Oh and I see this team are in a group with only 10 opponents, rather than 15... as if they needed any further help. |
well...if you would have entered there would have been one less filler at least... |
|
|
Timlagor
Joined: Feb 13, 2009
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 12:43 |
|
Why do the Eaters (linked in first post) sitll have the Temple Guard from the Lustrian Challenge? (should have been lost 2 years ago afaics) ..or did it come from something else? |
_________________ Time for a new .sig |
|
fly
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 12:51 |
|
the temple guard lasts until upcoming lustria - or his death, whichever comes first. |
_________________ I play for fun. I play to win.
Do you play CPOMB 'cause you can't win otherwise?
No, that's a rhetorical question. |
|
Markinthepast
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 12:52 |
|
When they won the Temple Guard from the Lustrian Challange the rules were different there was no time limit on it. |
|
|
PurpleChest
Joined: Oct 25, 2003
|
You are all both right and wrong.
The orginal TGC were absurdly powerful and permanent.
The new TGC still rocks, but now generates TR (they never did before) and stays only a year. It didnt seem fair to just yank away the ones that existed as the winners believed they had the player for life, so everry TGC owner was given a years notice and all existant will dissapear after the next LC.
Except for the one won that time, which will stay a year, then go. |
_________________ Barbarus hic ego sum, quia non intelligor illis -Ovid
I am a barbarian here because i am not understood by anyone |
|
maysrill
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 13:39 |
|
PurpleChest wrote: | You are all both right and wrong.
The orginal TGC were absurdly powerful and permanent.
The new TGC still rocks, but now generates TR (they never did before) and stays only a year. It didnt seem fair to just yank away the ones that existed as the winners believed they had the player for life, so everry TGC owner was given a years notice and all existant will dissapear after the next LC.
Except for the one won that time, which will stay a year, then go. |
Ironically, this would be the one instance where I could see "aging" as an acceptable solution. Basically, every year, every temple guard gains a niggling injury. That way people could keep them around as trophies/mascots, but lose the powerful presence on the team of a reliable player who shows up every game. |
|
|
SeraphimRed
Joined: Feb 01, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 14:03 |
|
|
Gritter
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 15:20 |
|
SeraphimRed wrote: |
So would be better named the Ball-Bag KO imho. |
Youve got such a purdee way with words Sera... |
|
|
shadow46x2
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 16:59 |
|
maysrill wrote: | Ironically, this would be the one instance where I could see
"aging" as an acceptable solution. |
aging is always acceptable
--j |
_________________
origami wrote: | There is no god but Nuffle, and Shadow is his prophet. |
|
|
Enar
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 17:16 |
|
shadow46x2 wrote: | maysrill wrote: | Ironically, this would be the one instance where I could see
"aging" as an acceptable solution. |
aging is always acceptable
--j |
Agreed, who wants to be forever young? |
|
|
ultwe
Joined: Dec 25, 2004
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 17:24 |
|
Enar wrote: | shadow46x2 wrote: | maysrill wrote: | Ironically, this would be the one instance where I could see
"aging" as an acceptable solution. |
aging is always acceptable
--j |
Agreed, who wants to be forever young? |
Alphaville
(so what if I show my age and lack of musical taste in my youth, as well as derail this thread, all in one fell swoop :-p ) |
_________________ Yeah, Nuffle sucks... That's because I play crap
π is aproximately 3.142 times better than any other food |
|
WindexChugger
Joined: Oct 06, 2008
|
  Posted:
Jan 14, 2010 - 17:33 |
|
PurpleChest wrote: | The orginal TGC were absurdly powerful and permanent. |
Just because he didn't accumulate SPP and count for TR, or were his stats different as well? |
_________________ Lizards 0f ¥umtum Mountain |
|
|