Alcibiade_2nd
Joined: Jan 16, 2012
|
  Posted:
Feb 10, 2012 - 15:27 |
|
Just a little idea/personal opinion. Cheerleaders and assistant coaches rarely seem to be bought by player. Their cost, even if low, doesn't seem to be on par with their potential utility, and they affect your TV. Making them inducements would let you rent some(with your inducement money or petty cash) without affecting your TV, and when you get smaller inducement money you could do something with it that is not overpowered.
Your opinions?
edit: 20k idea of woodstock is good
edit2: and/or put a limit like all the other inducement, like 0-2 for each |
Last edited by Alcibiade_2nd on %b %10, %2012 - %16:%Feb; edited 2 times in total |
|
Woodstock
Joined: Dec 11, 2004
|
  Posted:
Feb 10, 2012 - 15:32 |
|
Hmm, maybe make them 20k or even 30k to induce... otherwise they might be too good as inducement. Would make a funny house rule. |
|
|
blocknroll
Joined: Aug 04, 2009
|
  Posted:
Feb 10, 2012 - 15:36 |
|
im starting to wonder if they are undervalued by coaches currently, have played some older teams with 3 or 4 of each lately and laughed at the stupidity of the other coach only for them to win every kick off roll through them. Its something to think about... |
|
|
Diddyboy
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
|
  Posted:
Feb 10, 2012 - 15:36 |
|
20k as inducement to fill upp the gap between teams is not to bad |
|
|
King_Ghidra
Joined: Sep 14, 2009
|
  Posted:
Feb 10, 2012 - 16:38 |
|
Nice idea. Would help with the annoying odd bits of inducement money (10-40k) you can't currently use. |
|
|
Leilond
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
|
  Posted:
Feb 11, 2012 - 10:35 |
|
Yes, great idea, I think that 30k would be very nice... or 20 pheraps |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
  Posted:
Feb 11, 2012 - 11:26 |
|
i'd set them at 30, just so that the dreaded 40k inducement didn't mean 2 of them.
Also, I think they are more useful that people give them credit. 10 TV for much better chance of a RR on the kickoff table? |
_________________
|
|
Rabe
Joined: Jun 06, 2009
|
  Posted:
Feb 11, 2012 - 11:28 |
|
I like that idea. Just wouldn't want to ban them from the roster, but make the induced staff additional - like apos and RRs.
Edit:
My Agility Monsters have two assistant coaches fluff-wise - defensive and offensive coordinators. |
_________________ .
|
|
Emeric
Joined: May 25, 2011
|
  Posted:
Feb 11, 2012 - 11:34 |
|
Ssssh... Don't talk about them... You can't imagine the number of rerolls i have secured just by adding 20k TV in my box teams. How will i struggle victories if other coaches buy some too?
Well, on subject, making them 20k would be quite a good idea, yeah. |
_________________ Fill the BOX grid !
Francophone? #fumbbl.fr est là pour vous ! |
|
Were_M_Eye
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
|
  Posted:
Feb 11, 2012 - 12:00 |
|
|
Cavetroll
Joined: Jan 21, 2009
|
  Posted:
Feb 11, 2012 - 15:43 |
|
Woodstock wrote: | Hmm, maybe make them 20k or even 30k to induce... otherwise they might be too good as inducement. Would make a funny house rule. |
+1 as 20k. I think it would be a good house rule for League. The dreaded 40k would allow you 1 of each (or 2 of 1 if you so chose). The coach 40k up is still in a better position (2 normal skills vs. 2 items that normally only cost 20k to buy pre-game). |
_________________
nerf indigo 2016 |
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
  Posted:
Feb 11, 2012 - 16:03 |
|
+1. I like the idea of 20k each as inducement. |
|
|
plasmoid
Joined: Nov 03, 2009
|
  Posted:
Feb 12, 2012 - 07:29 |
|
This was playtested during the vault process and got canned (- though I don't remember the cost)
It made Ch/AC even less popular than they already are. And it made it quite easy to have 'just one more' than your opponent when you were the underdog.
Maybe make it even less precise... 50K for 2 staff? |
|
|
|