Nabolo
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
|
  Posted:
Nov 23, 2014 - 18:57 |
|
Hi all !
As I'm not familiar yet with how to deal the right with your TV, etc and how to calculate it, I wanted to have your advice regarding that player:
https://fumbbl.com/p/player?player_id=10328411
Should I keep it or not ? As a blitzer I mean, until he dies because of his AV7.
I never wanted to play with two catchers anyway so I could simply by a catcher to play his role and keep him as a blitzer... What I also would like to know is: how expensive is he compared to a blitzer with same/approximate competencies ?
Thx a lot to you all ! =) |
|
|
awambawamb
Joined: Feb 17, 2008
|
  Posted:
Nov 23, 2014 - 19:07 |
|
so now you got a St3 Block/Dodge Catcher without the stunty negatrait... skill him up, i would say Side Step and Sure Feet are the next two skills. |
_________________ "la virtù sta nel cielo e nella terra, ma anche nelle nuvole e nelle stelle"
|
|
Markusen
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
|
  Posted:
Nov 23, 2014 - 19:09 |
|
I'd keep him, but not using an apo on him anymore. |
|
|
Nabolo
Joined: Oct 17, 2014
|
  Posted:
Nov 23, 2014 - 19:11 |
|
Thx guys for your answers ! Can you tell me how calculate is TV value and compare it tp a blitzer ? |
|
|
BillBrasky
Joined: Feb 15, 2005
|
  Posted:
Nov 23, 2014 - 19:16 |
|
I think he costs too much TV for his worth:
Catcher (70k) + Block (20k) + Str (50k) - Ma(0) = 140k
He runs your TV up more than a Blitzer with MB & Piling (90 + 20 + 20).
I'd sack him. But that's just me |
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
  Posted:
Nov 23, 2014 - 19:30 |
|
|
Markusen
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
|
  Posted:
Nov 23, 2014 - 20:04 |
|
The catcher costs 140 TV like BillBrasky already shown.
A blitzer with dodge costs 120 TV (has +1AV and no Catch).
You can place that guy next to a claw player w/o any disadvantege or in any other dangerous area on the field you reallt don't want to have a blitzer (dodge gives him extra protection).
If he ever should skill again, give him Side Step to be annoying. But don't focus on him to feed him with more SPP. |
|
|
|
| |