Uedder
Joined: Aug 03, 2010
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 13:57 |
|
It's a toss between ma tackle and diving tackle. It really depends on what you want to do with this team. Having a st5 blodge (adding then sf) you can't dodge from is a nightmare. You can tie up many players with that piece alone.
Tackle will give more cas. If you plan to add wights to the roster then it won't be as important. Ma is nice but this guy is a roadblock and won't need to move that much. The st6 will always be better at breaking cages anyway.
If you plan to develop this team into a tourney thing i'd take dt. Otherwise tackle.
Ma if you want to add mobility but i see less use for it than others do. |
|
|
DrDiscoStu
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 14:01 |
|
|
Dominik
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 14:09 |
|
Stand Firm not SideStep, why waste a double and increase the costs by 10.000?
My opinion is +Ma>Tackle>Frenzy. |
|
|
tussock
Joined: May 29, 2011
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 14:13 |
|
You don't want to go down with DT, they'll just roll a 5. +MA is good, but take Tackle.
Even if dodgers are avoiding going near it, that's good stuff. |
_________________
|
|
sheepycollins
Joined: Sep 21, 2015
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 14:18 |
|
I wouldn't take frenzy on someone you'd want stand firm on, lose that control of positioning and doesn't have the speed to compensate. I agree MA > tackle then tackle > sidestep |
_________________ Things I like and things I hate? I don't feel like telling you that. My dreams for the future? Never really thought about that. As for my hobbies... I have lots of hobbies. |
|
CastleMan
Joined: Apr 26, 2013
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 14:23 |
|
Sidestep, followed by BT. |
|
|
Uedder
Joined: Aug 03, 2010
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 14:56 |
|
tussock wrote: | You don't want to go down with DT, they'll just roll a 5. +MA is good, but take Tackle.
Even if dodgers are avoiding going near it, that's good stuff. |
This makes no sense. The threat of causing a turnover outweights the danger of being to the ground with dt.
And even if he goes down? He will stand up next turn and still be in the middle of things. Even more so if he gets gangbooted. |
|
|
DrDiscoStu
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 15:00 |
|
|
Dominik
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 15:04 |
|
sheepycollins wrote: | I wouldn't take frenzy on someone you'd want stand firm on, lose that control of positioning and doesn't have the speed to compensate. I agree MA > tackle then tackle > sidestep |
Frenzy can help to control more of the opposing players if the blocked one has no Side Step.
Also with St5 Mighty Blow I do not want to control someone but to hurt someone. Frenzy helps with that.
Zombies are here to control opposing players. |
|
|
AutoAxpert
Joined: Oct 13, 2015
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 15:09 |
|
Dominik wrote: |
Frenzy can help to control more of the opposing players if the blocked one has no Side Step.
Also with St5 Mighty Blow I do not want to control someone but to hurt someone. Frenzy helps with that.
Zombies are here to control opposing players. |
Frenzy is a godsend on block players but a mummy is way too slow to use it effectively, IMO, and it forces you to follow up which is terrible on a reliable roadblock. You want your mummy standing and in the middle of the battle, not being kited across the pitch by dodge players. Frenzy is great on faster players, that's what wights are there for.
EDIT: Read the rules for the roster. Still, I see the two skellies (+MA and +ST would be both good at that) as a much better fit for the role. |
Last edited by AutoAxpert on %b %27, %2016 - %15:%Sep; edited 1 time in total |
|
Medon
Joined: Jan 28, 2015
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 15:27 |
|
(But AutoAxpert, there are no wights in this team...) |
|
|
Dominik
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 15:28 |
|
After +MA and then Tackle, Frenzy would be the ideal sixth and last skill choice. |
|
|
AutoAxpert
Joined: Oct 13, 2015
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 15:29 |
|
Medon wrote: | (But AutoAxpert, there are no wights in this team...) |
Yep, I didn't read the description and was talking in general. I still think frenzy is not that good on a mummy. |
|
|
Uedder
Joined: Aug 03, 2010
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 16:38 |
|
Also frenzy prevents grab which is nice to have on this kind of player. |
|
|
Antithesisoftime
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
|
  Posted:
Sep 27, 2016 - 20:38 |
|
I think I'm between +MA and side step at the moment, though diving tackle would make him a bit of a black hole. |
|
|
|