Rbthma
Joined: Jan 14, 2009
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 16:33 |
|
I for one am happy with it being Juggernaut - all 4 players who had PO had MB already. Thanks for the tough work, Christer. |
|
|
DrPoods
Joined: Nov 14, 2013
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 17:08 |
|
awambawamb wrote: | I'm more worried about the positional re-naming that, in my humble opinion, IT'S A TOTAL DISASTER.
Bloater?
Koka Kalim?
Chosen?
Anointed?
Enslaved?
damn 13yo wannabe nerds squeezing names from their zit stains on their mirrors |
ROTSPAWN FTL! |
_________________ "Gallifrey falls no more"
Do your part! Join the Adoption Agency NOW! |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 17:53 |
|
jugga-what? |
_________________
|
|
Sutherlands
Joined: Aug 01, 2009
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 18:41 |
|
m0gw41 wrote: | ph0enyx13 wrote: | Haha too bad this didn't affect league teams. I have one pomber, he is in league and now I can't use po cause it costs a reroll. |
You still can if you have some rr to spare at the end of a drive, or get pro on the player next skill. |
Can you actually use Pro to PO? If so, when does it prompt you whether to use Pro or team rr? |
|
|
thoralf
Joined: Mar 06, 2008
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 18:43 |
|
Can we finally talk about Wizzardz? Not that I wish to complain. Fumbbl staff is doing a great job and all that.
Still, I have Koncerns about Wizzardz.
ADD. And the Kardz. We need to talk about the Kardz too. |
_________________ There is always Sneaky Git.
Last edited by thoralf on %b %20, %2017 - %18:%Mar; edited 3 times in total |
|
Lordillo
Joined: Dec 11, 2011
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 18:44 |
|
Mh. What an unnecessary mess. I guess I will be playing much less here then.
Not because of the PO change, but because of the blind adherence to the nonsense GW is publishing. |
_________________
|
|
Lorebass
Joined: Jun 25, 2010
|
thoralf wrote: | Can we finally talk about Wizzardz? Not that I wish to complain. Fumbbl staff is doing a great job and all that.
Still, I have Koncerns about Wizzardz. |
You just click your heels three times and repeat
"There is no place like home" |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 18:48 |
|
ok, Q: what about L? can L admins remove PO, or what? Is is gone as a skill option? |
_________________
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 18:49 |
|
Lordillo wrote: | Mh. What an unnecessary mess. I guess I will be playing much less here then.
Not because of the PO change, but because of the blind adherence to the nonsense GW is publishing. |
oh please. drama queen |
_________________
|
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 18:56 |
|
|
bghandras
Joined: Feb 06, 2011
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 19:04 |
|
Hail Christer! Everything else is noise. |
_________________
|
|
Kalimar
Joined: Sep 22, 2006
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 19:11 |
|
@pythrr: yes PO is an option in Leaguesyou can continue to play LRB6 in league, everything new (such as Argue the call, Piling On costs a Team-Reroll etc.) is optional. |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 19:29 |
|
Kalimar wrote: | @pythrr: yes PO is an option in Leaguesyou can continue to play LRB6 in league, everything new (such as Argue the call, Piling On costs a Team-Reroll etc.) is optional. |
thanks!!! |
_________________
|
|
Mr_Foulscumm
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 19:40 |
|
Kalimar wrote: | @pythrr: yes PO is an option in Leaguesyou can continue to play LRB6 in league, everything new (such as Argue the call, Piling On costs a Team-Reroll etc.) is optional. |
If PO re-roll change is optional, why does it cost a RR in league at the moment? |
_________________ Everybody's favorite coach on FUMBBL |
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
  Posted:
Mar 20, 2017 - 19:48 |
|
Mr_Foulscumm wrote: | Kalimar wrote: | @pythrr: yes PO is an option in Leaguesyou can continue to play LRB6 in league, everything new (such as Argue the call, Piling On costs a Team-Reroll etc.) is optional. |
If PO re-roll change is optional, why does it cost a RR in league at the moment? |
League schemas need to be updated to reflect the possibile options available? |
|
|
|