ben_awesome
Joined: May 11, 2016
|
  Posted:
Sep 14, 2019 - 17:03 |
|
If you only got a stun they'd still be down on the pitch... |
|
|
razmus
Joined: Jun 23, 2017
|
  Posted:
Sep 14, 2019 - 18:10 |
|
ben_awesome wrote: | If you only got a stun they'd still be down on the pitch... |
Right. So apply the defenders +3 against armor on all the armor rolls against the defender AFTER they've gone down. (Of which there are zero rolls.) |
|
|
Archpeasant
Joined: Mar 07, 2008
|
  Posted:
Sep 14, 2019 - 18:39 |
|
razmus wrote: | Archpeasant wrote: | Why do you only get +3 when you blitz a chainsaw with a chainsaw? |
At a guess... it'd be because you aren't rolling after the defending chainsaw has gone prone. (I.e. As you roll... the chainsaw isn't known to be falling... hence the defending chainsaw isn't helping with the injury. It's only after the chainsaw player is going prone that it's +3 would apply... and that roll is now unnecessary. |
While I'm in no way advocating this to be actually implemented, it would make sense for his own chainsaw to come down and give him a second armor roll. |
|
|