thoralf
Joined: Mar 06, 2008
|
 Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 01:39 |
 
|
| Balle2000 wrote: | | Do CAS caused by fouls add to the post-season buy back budget? |
Good question.
Goblins' should. |
_________________
There is always Sneaky Git. |
|
Balle2000
Joined: Sep 25, 2008
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 02:02 |
|
| thoralf wrote: | | Balle2000 wrote: | | Do CAS caused by fouls add to the post-season buy back budget? |
Good question. |
I thought the point of this thread was you answering them?  |
|
|
thoralf
Joined: Mar 06, 2008
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 02:41 |
|
| Balle2000 wrote: |
I thought the point of this thread was you answering them? :evil: |
The point was to SPOT ALL THE RULZ!
All I can do is to read the rulz to you. Here's the relevant bit:
| Quote: | - 10,000 gp for each match the team played last seasons (both friendlies and competition games).
- 5,000 gp for each touchdown the team scored last season.
- 5,000 gp for each casualty the team caused last season.
|
I'm neither GW nor the Big C, so I can't offer you any authoritative interpretation on this.
If I find anything in the rulz on what it is for a team to cause a casualty, I'll clarify it.
***
Meanwhile, here's an interesting tidbit under Play-Offs (DZ1, p. 16):
| Quote: | The play-offs take place during the Season's End period, and are made up of two stages: semi-finals and finals. [...]
Finals and semi-finals cannot be drawn [...] Also, outside help is strictly forbidden during the finals and semi-finals, so teams cannot enlist the services of Star Players or Mercenaries during inducement. |
|
_________________
There is always Sneaky Git.
Last edited by thoralf on %b %29, %2016 - %04:%Nov; edited 1 time in total |
|
Matthueycamo
Joined: May 16, 2014
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 02:51 |
|
If it says casualty the team caused I would say that wording includes fouls. Crowdsurf CAS are caused by the crowd thus I don't think should be counted as caused by the team. Trips from dodges etc are perhaps a grey area in that I could see arguments for both sides. |
_________________
DLE College 7s |
|
Balle2000
Joined: Sep 25, 2008
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 02:55 |
|
| Matthueycamo wrote: | | If it says casualty the team caused I would say that wording includes fouls. Crowdsurf CAS are caused by the crowd thus I don't think should be counted as caused by the team. Trips from dodges etc are perhaps a grey area in that I could see arguments for both sides. |
That's the thing though. We are all more or less capable of doing the assumptions, that's why I asked for clarity (doesn't exist yet).
As Fumbbl works now Cas caused by blocks, blitzes and fouls count as Cas+. |
|
|
Traul
Joined: Jun 09, 2013
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 02:57 |
|
| garyt1 wrote: | | Most will not keep a fun but inefficient/expensive player if there is a penalty. |
There is no penalty in-game (i.e.: they do not cost more TV), they are just more expensive to keep at the season end, so coaches can keep their stars as long as they can afford them. |
|
|
misterlonestar
Joined: Oct 02, 2015
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 03:40 |
|
| Balle2000 wrote: |
As Fumbbl works now Cas caused by blocks, blitzes and fouls count as Cas+. |
I may be mistaken but Cas caused by Stabs are not counted as is and should be in my opinion. |
|
|
Matthueycamo
Joined: May 16, 2014
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 03:41 |
|
| Balle2000 wrote: | | Matthueycamo wrote: | | If it says casualty the team caused I would say that wording includes fouls. Crowdsurf CAS are caused by the crowd thus I don't think should be counted as caused by the team. Trips from dodges etc are perhaps a grey area in that I could see arguments for both sides. |
That's the thing though. We are all more or less capable of doing the assumptions, that's why I asked for clarity (doesn't exist yet).
As Fumbbl works now Cas caused by blocks, blitzes and fouls count as Cas+. |
Knowing GW they probably don't know themselves seeing as the don't write rules to be 100% crystal clear on purpose. |
_________________
DLE College 7s |
|
thoralf
Joined: Mar 06, 2008
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 03:55 |
|
Recurring concessions could wreck up a team's downtime if you get below your average number of CAS and TDs.
Killing sprees could increase with the incentive to have CAS and TDs for re-hiring.
Both phenomena could feed one another. |
_________________
There is always Sneaky Git. |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 04:13 |
|
| mrt1212 wrote: | | pythrr wrote: | | mrt1212 wrote: | | Balle2000 wrote: | | Do CAS caused by fouls add to the post-season buy back budget? |
Yes.
5,000 gp for each casualty the team caused last season.
The real rules lawyering comes in form of Diving Tackle - does causing a CAS through using Diving Tackle constitute a CAS you caused or is it only CAS that you rolled Dice for in your turn? |
wot about crowd pushes? |
Thank you pythrr, I knew I could count on you to bring up the other rules lawyer thing. |
wot about WIZZARD rips?
wot about ROCKS?
curious minds need to know! |
_________________
 |
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 04:17 |
|
| pythrr wrote: | | mrt1212 wrote: | | pythrr wrote: | | mrt1212 wrote: | | Balle2000 wrote: | | Do CAS caused by fouls add to the post-season buy back budget? |
Yes.
5,000 gp for each casualty the team caused last season.
The real rules lawyering comes in form of Diving Tackle - does causing a CAS through using Diving Tackle constitute a CAS you caused or is it only CAS that you rolled Dice for in your turn? |
wot about crowd pushes? |
Thank you pythrr, I knew I could count on you to bring up the other rules lawyer thing. |
wot about WIZZARD rips?
wot about ROCKS?
curious minds need to know! |
LET IT FLOW THROUGH YOU! |
|
|
licker
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 04:23 |
|
| Matthueycamo wrote: | | Balle2000 wrote: | | Matthueycamo wrote: | | If it says casualty the team caused I would say that wording includes fouls. Crowdsurf CAS are caused by the crowd thus I don't think should be counted as caused by the team. Trips from dodges etc are perhaps a grey area in that I could see arguments for both sides. |
That's the thing though. We are all more or less capable of doing the assumptions, that's why I asked for clarity (doesn't exist yet).
As Fumbbl works now Cas caused by blocks, blitzes and fouls count as Cas+. |
Knowing GW they probably don't know themselves seeing as the don't write rules to be 100% crystal clear on purpose. |
I don't think it's on purpose, I think it's accidental.
Which is the kind way of saying they don't know what the @#$# they are doing. |
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 04:55 |
|
I guess only the Casualties giving SPPs should be considered, i.e. those inflicted by blocks and blitzes, unless the new ruleset changed that. |
|
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 05:21 |
|
| MattDakka wrote: | | I guess only the Casualties giving SPPs should be considered, i.e. those inflicted by blocks and blitzes, unless the new ruleset changed that. |
Why would you guess that? |
|
|
thoralf
Joined: Mar 06, 2008
|
| Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 05:53 |
|
Y U NO GIVE GPS FOR WINS, GW? |
_________________
There is always Sneaky Git. |
|
|
|
New Gnones vs Old Gn...
Search
