pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
  Posted:
Nov 18, 2015 - 07:33 |
|
stunty is fun
MOAR TOURNYs! |
_________________
|
|
ElanTheBard
Joined: May 05, 2006
|
  Posted:
Nov 20, 2015 - 16:13 |
|
What about give to Stunty the blackbox scheduler system insead of the gamefinder?
In case of very wrong match-ups (like 500 TV difference or more) at least the game will still be fun, as inducements in stunty are much more effective than in CRP! |
_________________ “Look behind you, a Three-Headed Monkey!” |
|
PainState
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
|
  Posted:
Nov 20, 2015 - 16:38 |
|
Ryld wrote: | What about give to Stunty the blackbox scheduler system insead of the gamefinder?
In case of very wrong match-ups (like 500 TV difference or more) at least the game will still be fun, as inducements in stunty are much more effective than in CRP! |
Well why not run the big experiment in Stunty of having both!
Gamefinder and Box activation. |
_________________ Comish of the: |
|
mister__joshua
Joined: Jun 20, 2007
|
Ryld wrote: | What about give to Stunty the blackbox scheduler system insead of the gamefinder?
In case of very wrong match-ups (like 500 TV difference or more) at least the game will still be fun, as inducements in stunty are much more effective than in CRP! |
That might not be a bad idea. In my experience large TV gaps in Stunty can often favour the underdog anyway (except for maybe high TV nurgs and gnomes).
@painstate: I like the idea, but not sure Stunty has enough active teams/players to support that.
Edit: It could be fun even to have a scheduler just for the Necromiser each year? |
|
|
ElanTheBard
Joined: May 05, 2006
|
  Posted:
Nov 20, 2015 - 17:39 |
|
PainState wrote: | Ryld wrote: | What about give to Stunty the blackbox scheduler system insead of the gamefinder?
In case of very wrong match-ups (like 500 TV difference or more) at least the game will still be fun, as inducements in stunty are much more effective than in CRP! |
Well why not run the big experiment in Stunty of having both!
Gamefinder and Box activation. |
As mister__joshua said, I don't think it would be a good idea to split the already few players in 2 separate groups.
I really think that a BB scheduler will bring a lot of new life and chaos to the Stunty Leeg! |
_________________ “Look behind you, a Three-Headed Monkey!” |
|
Mr_Foulscumm
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
|
  Posted:
Nov 20, 2015 - 17:48 |
|
Clearly the only thing Stunty needs for it to improve are for more coaches figuring out that it's the best thing Fumbbl has to offer. |
_________________ Everybody's favorite coach on FUMBBL |
|
m0gw41
Joined: Jun 12, 2012
|
  Posted:
Nov 20, 2015 - 17:53 |
|
I don't think a Stunty Blackbox would work long term, not enough players as it is and even if enough coaches could come on it just would encourage more boring minmaxed Cheaters and BlockleMB spam Skyre teams. I already get bored of seeing seas of the same team types in GF.
I wouldn't mind a "November Necromiser Madness" month where Stunty switches to Box though, probably a nightmare to implement though! |
_________________
|
|
Sigmar1
Joined: Aug 13, 2008
|
  Posted:
Nov 20, 2015 - 18:04 |
|
The Greenfield Rumblers (who are admittedly playing WAY above a reasonable TV for this race) have just come thru a match vs a BlackleMB spam Skryre team which had the ref in their pocket the entire match.
Yeah, we got pitch-cleared in the first half. And then came back to win it anyway! Booyah! (Granted, that was some lucky-a** sh*t, but still, I hate playing Skryre). |
_________________ Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges! |
|
Deniz87
Joined: Aug 06, 2011
|
  Posted:
Nov 20, 2015 - 18:07 |
|
I would have liked more the "utopian" idea of scheduled leagues/tournaments. |
|
|
luxyluxo
Joined: Nov 26, 2012
|
  Posted:
Nov 20, 2015 - 18:22 |
|
Will stunty be included in the upcoming planned league reforms ? |
|
|
WhatBall
Joined: Aug 21, 2008
|
  Posted:
Nov 21, 2015 - 00:29 |
|
luxyluxo wrote: | Will stunty be included in the upcoming planned league reforms ? |
It is being discussed. |
_________________
|
|
|