MadMac321
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
|
 Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 06:53 |
 
|
Hey,
I am looking for a little discussion on +2 movement on a Human Catcher.
I have a human catcher with +1 movement and he just rolled a 10 (no doubles) for another +1 movement.
My thoughts are that while +2 movement would be great he really does not need it.
10 movement will put him way out on his own with a big (even bigger) target on his chest. I am leaning towards block to increase his survivabiliy.
Any thoughts |
|
|
The_Decon
Joined: Jan 07, 2007
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 06:55 |
|
|
The_Decon
Joined: Jan 07, 2007
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 06:56 |
|
LOL, i see you took the MA already... why make a thread if you were already decided ? |
|
|
shadow46x2
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 08:18 |
|
yeah ....
scoring one-turners is so much fun
/sarcasm off
--j |
_________________
| origami wrote: | | There is no god but Nuffle, and Shadow is his prophet. |
  |
|
Alanir
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 08:37 |
|
Taking any skill puts a big target on the player. If I have the chance to take out a player with block vs no block, I'd foul the later.
Oh, and Shadow is wrong. Humans can only win if they have a one turn scorer. Otherwise it's impossible at TR 110+ |
|
|
shadow46x2
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 09:05 |
|
|
MadMac321
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 09:38 |
|
Two reasons. When I was writing my post and choosing the poll options I pretty much reasoned in my head that a move 10 guy is probably going to get block sooner or later anyway. The movement is not what makes him a target it is the STR 2. Just about anybody can hit him solo.
I am impatient and did not want to wait for the poll I guess. LOL
| The_Decon wrote: | | LOL, i see you took the MA already... why make a thread if you were already decided ? |
|
|
|
Wreckage
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 10:33 |
|
| The_Decon wrote: | | LOL, i see you took the MA already... why make a thread if you were already decided ? |
| MadMac321 wrote: |
I am impatient and did not want to wait for the poll I guess. LOL |
hmmh.... if everyone in this community would make polls for all the skills they get im pretty sure, the forum would be seriously spammed....
..my thanks to everyone who did not... |
|
|
MadMac321
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 11:02 |
|
| Wreckage wrote: | | The_Decon wrote: | | LOL, i see you took the MA already... why make a thread if you were already decided ? |
| MadMac321 wrote: |
I am impatient and did not want to wait for the poll I guess. LOL |
hmmh.... if everyone in this community would make polls for all the skills they get im pretty sure, the forum would be seriously spammed....
..my thanks to everyone who did not... |
Well the results of the poll confirmed my decision so I am happy with it.
If you think skill roll questions are a waste of time then do not read them. The title of the post was +2 movement on a human catcher. I only expected comments from someone that was interested in reading about +2 movement on a human catcher.
It is simple enough to look up how skill rolls are taken statistically. I enjoy reading the reasoning behind other coaches skill choices that I find in these skill roll posts.
Usually, like now the discussion involves long term team and player developement and not just the individual skill. |
|
|
DukeTyrion
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 11:28 |
|
Nice way to treat the community you are asking from advice from 
Make a Poll .... Decide anyway ... attack someone who comments ...
... I will look forward to your other fun threads  |
|
|
JanMattys
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 12:00 |
|
| DukeTyrion wrote: | Nice way to treat the community you are asking from advice from
Make a Poll .... Decide anyway ... attack someone who comments ...
... I will look forward to your other fun threads |
Indeed. |
_________________
 |
|
McLaren
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 12:05 |
|
If he gets sprint he is a one-turner... Any one-turner that is not a GR is quite cool, though... |
|
|
Optihut
Joined: Dec 16, 2004
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 12:14 |
|
| shadow46x2 wrote: | yeah ....
scoring one-turners is so much fun
/sarcasm off
--j |
If people set up properly against one turners, their TD is by no means guaranteed. Scoring on one turn is indeed great fun, even without sarcasm. |
|
|
Zingr
Joined: Mar 14, 2004
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 22:02 |
|
| Optihut wrote: | | shadow46x2 wrote: | yeah ....
scoring one-turners is so much fun
/sarcasm off
--j |
If people set up properly against one turners, their TD is by no means guaranteed. Scoring on one turn is indeed great fun, even without sarcasm. |
/me agrees
In particular those that involve at least one chainpush. |
|
|
TBK
Joined: Feb 03, 2006
|
| Posted:
Apr 28, 2007 - 22:21 |
|
With a good defense a 3ag one turn TD is hard, even with good chain pushes to remove some of the GFIs.
Still worth the try though.
| Alanir wrote: | | Humans can only win if they have a one turn scorer. Otherwise it's impossible at TR 110+ |
LOL, not entirely accurate.  |
|
|
|
|
Secret League Americ...
Search
