“Opponent took an inordinate number of bad risks, and whenever he failed a roll, he started complaining about the RNG. At one point in the second half, he completed two unskilled 3+ dodges, made four 2+ rolls, then threw an interception, and insisted that this meant FUMBBL was unfair. (The odds of getting even as far as he got were less than one in four.) It would have been hilarious except that he then stopped taking actions, clicking through his turns. That's lame. :( Opponent also cited how he's so much luckier in the Australian TT community, as if the Australian TT community played at the same level as FUMBBL Ranked….
Look, brah, the game is what it is. The nature of random distribution and the way the turnover rule works, if you plan around needing six rolls and only make the first three, you don't get to make the last one. You opened multiple turns with naked d6 rolls, and that's just not a winning way to play. Bear with it; this game is about how you maximize your odds and how you respond to the bad dice, not about how you somehow luck into having only good rolls.”
Click on the charts to toggle relative statistics.
Look, brah, the game is what it is. The nature of random distribution and the way the turnover rule works, if you plan around needing six rolls and only make the first three, you don't get to make the last one. You opened multiple turns with naked d6 rolls, and that's just not a winning way to play. Bear with it; this game is about how you maximize your odds and how you respond to the bad dice, not about how you somehow luck into having only good rolls.”