tibbo
Joined: Aug 09, 2014
|
 Posted:
Mar 13, 2015 - 01:07 |
 
|
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2015 - 01:11 |
|
|
happygrue
Joined: Oct 15, 2010
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2015 - 01:48 |
|
You've got me beat on the deaths in 22 games. But then again, I've got you beat on SI in 22 games. 
https://fumbbl.com/p/team?team_id=763656
And -30 cas ratio vs -60!  |
_________________
Come join us in #metabox, the Discord channel for HLP, ARR, and E.L.F. in the box!
 |
|
Kam
Joined: Nov 06, 2012
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2015 - 01:51 |
|
|
seanh1986
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2015 - 01:59 |
|
On average, 1 out of every 6 casualties is a death, 2/6 is SI and 3/6 is BH.
When you look at past players, it's all the players that die and those that sustained serious injuries to the point that you decided to retire them.
As you accumulate casualties against, most BH and SI won't result in retirement (e.g., MNG or stat decreases that are deemed acceptable)... So, it should be reasonable to see a more heavy dose of "dead" in the past players categories.
Older teams (e.g., LRB4) that dealt with aging and annoying niggling injuries where players would miss the entire game yet their value still counted towards the TV lead to many more players being prematurely retired. Also teams that are "min-maxing" (trying to get the maximum strength out of the minimum TV) tend to retire a lot more players. |
|
|
SWL Season CI
Search
