peikko
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
 Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 19:24 |
 
|
revised VampFlings roster:
http://www.wastedpla.net/revisedvampflings.html
addition to this roster is freebootable Lord:
1 LordFling 5 4 4 8 Razors, Hypnogaze, Regenerate, Undead, 50k G S A
make a note that vampflings do NOT get any BGs |
Last edited by peikko on %b %04, %2003 - %19:%Aug; edited 1 time in total |
|
gorritakid
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 19:32 |
|
|
psikobunny
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 19:41 |
|
so the vampires are just like regular vampires except they have -1ST, -1MA, -1AV, gain RSC, and go down in price by 30k....
no no no no no no
even with the minuses they easily overpower regular players in stunty stat wise. You're allowed 6 of them, and they start with a skill whose sole purpose to to kill other teams. Am I the only one who see's a problem with that?
I think people should play and and enjoy the rosters we have for a month or two instead of trying to add a new one every week. There are so many teams out there now with only one or two games, and people dont need more rosters to choose from. If we like Stunty let's play stunty instead of just tinkering with it.
Before Cusi starts babbling about how I fear change, I'll close by saying I prefer we use what we got instead of heaping more on top of it. |
|
|
gorritakid
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 19:49 |
|
As I said before, Go Vampflings!!! |
|
|
peikko
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 19:51 |
|
Vampflings aint just one of roster writen down just for the sillines of it. We have playtested it to be sure its balanced in low, mid and hight TR.
There IS plenty of new rosters now in stunty but vampflings stand out from them cause theyre very different from others having ofab which makes
playing with them very different.
About they beeing violent... you erally think these bloodsuckers are more violent than teams with 2 tackle-multiblow-razor minotaurs etc.  |
|
|
peikko
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 19:57 |
|
| psikobunny wrote: |
I think people should play and and enjoy the rosters we have for a month or two instead of trying to add a new one every week. There are so many teams out there now with only one or two games, and people dont need more rosters to choose from. |
you smell something burning?
Could it be that theres just not enought really interesting or different concepts in the ones added now... |
|
|
Frankenstein
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 20:31 |
|
| psikobunny wrote: | | even with the minuses they easily overpower regular players in stunty stat wise. You're allowed 6 of them, and they start with a skill whose sole purpose to to kill other teams. Am I the only one who see's a problem with that? |
No, I agree with you.
There seems to be a tremendous urge to have rosters with positional players which start with the strongest skills and traits available (here it is RSC, a trait the ordinary vampires don't come with). The same was true for the horrors which were supposed start with Big Hand, Claw, RSC and Tentacles iirc. That would be powergaming to the worst degree, IMHO.
Especially in the stunty leeg, players should not start with high coveted skills and traits, not even Block.
Why should Vampflings come with RSC when their greater brethren do not, I wonder? |
|
|
peikko
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 20:51 |
|
they dotn have claws, they have fangs  All vampires should bite hard. In this case we dont really think its overpowering them. The lack of BG's really balance that out. |
|
|
Pardus
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 21:14 |
|
put some more effort into creating the team than just taking the vampire roster and weakening it... i can see a possibility of using ofab in a stunty team... who in the hell says it has to be vamps?
ofab might be a nice neg for the nurgle beast while i think about it |
|
|
CopyCat
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 21:35 |
|
i agree with peikko.. and instead of bubling, nugling and talking, ahh whata overpowering team just try to play that rooster instead ... RSC yes.. but armor is 7... not 8, not 9 as for big guys.. test games I played seemed very funny, a bit bloody yes.. but mine snots have seen more bloodier games vs chaos flings with RSC or just simple trolls.. |
|
|
CopyCat
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 22:22 |
|
Mirascael : they have RSC because, they are smaller, they teeths are smaller, thus SHARPER  |
|
|
Mr-Klipp
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 22:58 |
|
| CopyCat wrote: | | Mirascael : they have RSC because, they are smaller, they teeths are smaller, thus SHARPER |
While I can certianly understand this reasoning(ever been bitten by a kitten? mouth full of little needles) it would probably be first on my list of things to see go. |
|
|
cusi
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2003 - 23:01 |
|
heh
the rsf is one of the funner things about them
and is a terror to the thralls
let 'em keep their dainty sharp fangs
 |
_________________
Check out the latest issue of The Grotty Little Newspaper yet? |
|
Mr-Klipp
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 05, 2003 - 00:10 |
|
Actually, thralls should not suffer the penalty. The rules state that the injury roll on the thrall is unmodified, the client is not currently doing it correctly. |
_________________
Looking to get your minis painted? Look no further.
The Finishing Touch |
|
Twahn
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 05, 2003 - 00:27 |
|
| psikobunny wrote: | | I think people should play and and enjoy the rosters we have for a month or two instead of trying to add a new one every week. There are so many teams out there now with only one or two games, and people dont need more rosters to choose from. If we like Stunty let's play stunty instead of just tinkering with it. |
Hey, here's an idea... let's get all the normal teams, give their players -1MV, -1ST, -1AV, and add -flings to the end of their names...  |
|
|
|
|
Gnome Roster - how a...
Search
