Duckwing
Joined: Oct 15, 2008
|
  Posted:
Apr 11, 2017 - 16:34 |
|
Arguing the call should come before bribes when secret weapons are being sent of after a drive ends. It can be vital to be able to save a bribe if you roll that six. |
|
|
Craftnburn
Joined: Jul 29, 2005
|
  Posted:
Apr 11, 2017 - 17:41 |
|
That really doesn't make sense from a logic standpoint (I don't deny it's better from a coaches perspective).
You Bribe the official to NOT try to eject the player, not wait till he does and then try to pay him to talk him out of it (that's arguing the call). |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
  Posted:
Apr 11, 2017 - 17:48 |
|
CB seems logically correct here |
_________________
|
|
PeteW
Joined: Aug 05, 2005
|
  Posted:
Apr 11, 2017 - 17:51 |
|
Thematically I can see it either way.
1. You get sent off, and you rant and rave at the ref... but he doesn't change his mind... so you slip him a pile of cash to ignore it!
or
2. You get sent off and slip the ref a pile of cash to look the other way. He takes the cash... but send your man off anyway! So you rant and rave and argue with him to try to get him to change his mind (especially considering he stole your money).
Coaches choice looks best to me, thematically and from a coaches' point of view. |
_________________ "Jesus loves me this I know, 'cos my Bible tells me so." MrMojo - where did you go? |
|
ArrestedDevelopment
Joined: Sep 14, 2015
|
  Posted:
Apr 11, 2017 - 17:55 |
|
Coaches choice is best because yes, as Pete describes it fits fluff fine. But also because the rulebook doesn't say you have to use them in any particular order. |
_________________
|
|
Squiglet
Joined: Aug 13, 2015
|
  Posted:
Apr 11, 2017 - 18:17 |
|
From the FAQ - you can use them in any order |
|
|
sann0638
Joined: Aug 09, 2010
|
  Posted:
Apr 11, 2017 - 18:39 |
|
Yep, GW say either order/ |
_________________ NAF Ex-President
Founder of SAWBBL, Wiltshire's BB League on Facebook and Discord |
|