Skulll
Joined: Dec 08, 2005
|
 Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 20:15 |
 
|
I don't recall any grandfathered team ever doing anything remarkable or special because of having something new teams can't have. Maybe win random a game or few. No big deal. I can't see why this would be some major issue now... |
|
|
Nighteye
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
|
| Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 20:17 |
|
| Hero164 wrote: | | I was chatting in the IRC and asked the questions about gobbos being snots and beastmen becoming rotters (i wanted some pestigors) this is all from christer. |
Beastmen needs to be converted to rotters not pestigors or you would have a really retarded team. Even more retarded than the ogre teams we will get to see. |
|
|
f_alk
Joined: Sep 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 20:20 |
|
Not that I disagree with your general message, but to be precise, it was 4 days (5th, 6th, 9th, 10th of Sept). So using the word "exactly" is a bit ... well ... questionable.
| Thomcat wrote: | | But I would not be affraid it will happend before the client is at least as ready as the lrb 4 javabowl client is. |
The new client is already closer to CRP than Javabowl ever was to LRB4. ... And don't forget, the Javabowl client *never* made it out of beta status. |
|
|
Zombie69
Joined: Jul 02, 2007
|
| Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 20:50 |
|
Well, goodbye Fumbbl. The day teams start moving to LRB5+, i'm gone. |
|
|
Brinbrin84
Joined: Jul 23, 2010
|
| Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 20:59 |
|
snip |
Last edited by Brinbrin84 on %b %11, %2010 - %21:%Sep; edited 1 time in total |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 21:05 |
|
| Zombie69 wrote: | | Well, goodbye Fumbbl. The day teams start moving to LRB5+, i'm gone. |
see yA!. |
|
|
shadow46x2
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 22:06 |
|
| Thomcat wrote: | It has - just not for a long time  but yeah a bit early to conclude on it |
thomcat...you know that part where i said "don't let facts get in the way of your opinions"?...you know that was sarcasm, right?....you know that wasn't a suggestion to adopt that mentality as a way of life, right?...
just checking...
| f_alk wrote: |
Not that I disagree with your general message, but to be precise, it was 4 days (5th, 6th, 9th, 10th of Sept). So using the word "exactly" is a bit ... well ... questionable. |
true...think i miscounted the 6th...woops
| Zombie69 wrote: | | Well, goodbye Fumbbl. The day teams start moving to LRB5+, i'm gone. |
you're still here?
--j |
_________________
| origami wrote: | | There is no god but Nuffle, and Shadow is his prophet. |
  |
|
SillySod
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
|
| Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 22:40 |
|
| shadow46x2 wrote: | | Zombie69 wrote: | | Well, goodbye Fumbbl. The day teams start moving to LRB5+, i'm gone. |
you're still here?
--j |
Zombie whines loud enough that I dont believe this is an honest mistake
(Disclaimer: zombie you'd be great if it wasnt for this LRB5 hate thing) |
_________________
Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.
"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced." |
|
Synn
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
|
| Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 22:42 |
|
| shadow46x2 wrote: |
| Zombie69 wrote: | | Well, goodbye Fumbbl. The day teams start moving to LRB5+, i'm gone. |
you're still here?
--j |
On that note.....
Image changed. Stay off the gore please.
/Leijonet
__Synn |
|
|
Fela
Joined: Dec 27, 2004
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2010 - 00:41 |
|
Sincerely missing a report button for Synn's post. |
|
|
Cloggy
Joined: Sep 23, 2004
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2010 - 00:41 |
|
| Zombie69 wrote: | | Well, goodbye Fumbbl. The day teams start moving to LRB5+, i'm gone. |
*wave* |
_________________
Proud owner of three completed Ranked grids, sadly lacking in having a life. |
|
Nightbird
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2010 - 01:49 |
|
| Zombie69 wrote: | | Well, goodbye Fumbbl. The day teams start moving to LRB5+, i'm gone. |
Don't let the door hit you in the a**
=) |
_________________
"If most of us remain ignorant of ourselves, it's because self-knowledge is painful
& we prefer the pleasures of illusion." ~Aldous Huxley |
|
Redgum
Joined: May 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2010 - 02:15 |
|
I think teams should be trimmed to the positional player limits of FFB before a transfer. The coach would be responsible for ensuring that the team conformed to FFB roster before applying for a transfer.
Skills would transfer. There's no way of knowing what the dice were that gave that skill. It may just make some grandfathered teams that look like they got some exceptional skill rolls. There's no aging either in FFB so players with an aging injury would carry that over. |
_________________
| Tomay wrote: | | Thanks Redgum, you are a legend... |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2010 - 02:24 |
|
I think teams should .... oh wait, what do you mean I don't get a vote....? Oh, I see. Yes, I get it now... |
_________________
 |
|
Purplegoo
Joined: Mar 23, 2006
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2010 - 09:34 |
|
Hurrah for the Staff and the client developers for moving along. Hats off for all the hard work.
I love the idea of the grandfathered silly LRB4 massive TR teams coming across with a bunch of sub optimal skills and giving away lots of Inducements. Another reason LRB6 high TV events will be worthwhile in a way their predecessors weren't!
I do wonder what the plan for the bigger leagues onsite is... |
|
|
|
|
Finishing the 60 Gam...
Search
