93 coaches online • Server time: 20:49
Index Search Usergroups Profile
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Eur'Open Onlinegoto Post L Division 2020.goto Post Recovering an accoun...
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Endzone



Joined: Apr 01, 2008

Post   Posted: Oct 01, 2020 - 12:56 Reply with quote Back to top

MattDakka wrote:
Endzone wrote:
Giving the ball carrier -1ST to represent the hinderance of holding the ball could be a start.

I like this idea. I always thought that the ball should give some malus to the ball carrier.
It would make for example easier to sack Bull Centaurs.
Extra Arms players should be immune from the -ST malus, because they can use one hand to carry the ball and two to block opponents/defend themselves.


Another way would be to say the ball carrier doesn't have a tacklezone (which again works thematically). One effect of this would be that it would be easier to dodge next to a ball carrier to sack them.
bghandras



Joined: Feb 06, 2011

Post   Posted: Oct 01, 2020 - 13:00 Reply with quote Back to top

I like this last one the most personally.

_________________
Image
Endzone



Joined: Apr 01, 2008

Post   Posted: Oct 01, 2020 - 13:27 Reply with quote Back to top

bghandras wrote:
I like this last one the most personally.


My suggestions above only make stalling harder to execute under certain circumstances. I still think stalling would be popular because reducing the number of turns your opponent has to score back that half would still be beneficial. If you really wanted to stop stalling you would need more fundamental change to the rules that affected the viability of the stalling strategy rather than the ease of doing it. e.g. The kicking team kicks after every touchdown that half.
stej



Joined: Jan 05, 2009

Post   Posted: Oct 01, 2020 - 19:48 Reply with quote Back to top

I always think there should be more fun stuff in bloodbowl.
+1 to AV roll if you roll double pows
Knockdowns from a 3D block give +1 to injury but remove the injury modifier from stunty / titchy
HouseBlackfyre



Joined: Aug 10, 2019

Post   Posted: Oct 01, 2020 - 23:18 Reply with quote Back to top

A deeper endzone would significantly affect kickoffs, and more importantly, kickoff scatters out of bounds.
mekutata



Joined: May 03, 2015

Post   Posted: Oct 01, 2020 - 23:40 Reply with quote Back to top

Could also position your Hail Mary Bomma in a more safe spot Smile

_________________
Image
Verminardo



Joined: Sep 27, 2006

Post   Posted: Oct 02, 2020 - 08:04 Reply with quote Back to top

Endzone wrote:
ClayInfinity wrote:
How does a deeper endzone limit stalling potential?


I suppose I could make a philosophical argument against it.


Hahaha nice one! Laughing
garyt1



Joined: Mar 12, 2011

Post   Posted: Oct 02, 2020 - 21:05 Reply with quote Back to top

It would make 80 TV for +1 ST more justifiable.

_________________
A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer.
PirateRob



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Oct 02, 2020 - 22:50 Reply with quote Back to top

Ball should effectively give you dirty player cuz you can spike it on their head.

Also what's possibly more Nuffle pleasing then a bonus to fouling for the ball carrier?
fidius



Joined: Jun 17, 2011

Post   Posted: Oct 03, 2020 - 09:04 Reply with quote Back to top

PirateRob wrote:
Ball should effectively give you dirty player cuz you can spike it on their head.

Also what's possibly more Nuffle pleasing then a bonus to fouling for the ball carrier?

Thread winner
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic