Posted by B_SIDE on 2013-08-31 22:16:27
On a Troll Slayer? Never. There are plenty of 3 AG players on the Dwarf team already.
I think the Agility Monsters would have taken the +stat. :)
In my local TT league, I have a CD team with a 3AG blocker. I only took the +AG because I have a CD model with two heads and three arms, and I wanted an excuse to put him on the pitch.
Posted by Russo on 2013-08-31 22:20:49
Heheh well if I get a model with 7 heads, 5 arms and 6 tails do I get to roll all those skills and stat modifiers for my skills too :-)
Posted by Overhamsteren on 2013-08-31 22:52:41
Lol this is just rubbing salt in Rabe's wound :D
Posted by Russo on 2013-08-31 23:10:48
Further to earlier post, this Dwarf team have had 3 x +1AG in 4 skill rolls.....makes me think this should be The Agility Monsters!
Posted by ultwe on 2013-08-31 23:34:16
https://fumbbl.com/p/player?player_id=3429005
Was he usefull? NO!!
Was he fun to have around, HELL YEAH!!
Posted by pythrr on 2013-09-01 00:24:43
noob
Posted by Rabe on 2013-09-01 00:39:26
I have accepted that Nuffle is mocking my Monsters when it comes to +AG - he has given me a lot of doubles and an okay amount of other stat increases, so I don't complain. :-)
On another team I have this troll slayer:
https://fumbbl.com/p/player?player_id=7044307
I can't even say if he has been very effective in the few games I played with AG 4, but he is definitely a lot of fun, being able to handle the ball and dodge and all...
Yes, I would have taken +AG without further considerations. AG 3 on a slayer is not completely useless in my book, since if you use him for blitzing, he can dodge free to do so semi-reliable. Don't think that's a great reasoning, but it's not completely stupid (of course someone will now point out that it's completely stupid). :-)
Posted by nThatch on 2013-09-03 06:07:04
http://fumbbl.com/p/team?team_id=745705
Having ag3 guards available is priceless when you need to do that despeate move. (Noobs like me need ag ;)