first:
Is this propaganda or is it a guide?
i have a feeling its written mostly to justify the behaviour, rather than to educate others
Remove the stuff about yourself, some context is nice but this just looks juvenile at the minute

second:
History section is interesting info but some of the links didn't work on the google doc.
Remove the heroism propaganda from the history section's intro, min/max is about efficiency, not bravery. no-one ever took killer pact to prey on noob teams because they were brave.

third:
cherrypicking section is bad. confusing, too much about you, and the orc team example doesnt explain anything well.
"Although coaches can be engaged in both, min/maxing is not the same as cherrypicking"

fourth:
against the rules section - its not against the rules, simple.

the ethical stuff could/should be another section. i'd make it clear you're not talking about a league environment or building a team for a tournament, but instead it relates to the behaviour emergent in a TV-matching environment. if people don't like it, maybe it means they don't like a TV-matching environment and would prefer to play in [L]eague.


fifth:
"Min/max teams have a huge advantage (particularly in the team-value based draws of Blackbox division) due to having more (and more effective) skills than an opposing team which does not min/max."

this is the crux of the article surely but you missed explaining why it works.

explain the synergy of stacking skills on a few players, makes it stronger than spreading skills around
explain that with only 1 blitz a turn, putting all kill-skills on the blitzer gives best value
explain that tying up opponents is done best by cheap no-skill meatshields
explain that having dodge and block on the same player is harder to knock down than block on one player, dodge on another player
explain that with only 1 guy carrying the ball at a time, you want him to have max chance of avoiding the knockdown


sixth:
"Damnit, I’m about to be bent over by some Min/Maxers. What should I do?"
you missed any actually useful info here
how about tie up the killer, with cheap fodder? foul him every time you can? block him every time you can? focus on the low RRs of the minmax and make him take lots of chances?
read the rules about concession and consider bowing out of the game if you're losing, hating it, and the concession would be legal

seventh:
"Section II: The Tactics of Min/Max"
you missed any actual tactics info here
rename it to "Min/Max Team Build Guide"

include some actual tactics, like:
how to play with very few rerolls and when to use/not use them
how to shield your killer, and set him up with targets to maximise his potential
discuss when to take a apothecary
discuss how many RR's to take
you missed mentioning anywhere a key component, that of firing healthy players once they get a skill to keep the TV down

eighth:
downsides. all killer teams induce rage and drive players away, playing at low TV means you're less likely to kill someone's favorite legend.. but a significant issue is driving away rookie coaches in their first games, which would be very detrimental to the community.
other downsides? boring games? stifling? I dunno.

finally:
The main intro is bad and rambles around a lot, yet the point you're making is simple. how about this:


"Bloodbowl is a game with rules developed for tabletop league play
In a league environment it's effective to build a big team and bully everyone smaller than you, only held in check by spiraling expenses.

In a perpetual TV-matching environment, building a big team just means you face another big team.
Every skill you have is giving another skill to your average opponent, so every increase needs to justify its cost in team-value, otherwise compared to a well-managed opponent team of the same TV, you become bloated and less effective.

This naturally leads to team management, for example skinks don't have access to skills which really justify their cost, yet they'll be the ones scoring and gaining SPP.
it makes sense to fire them and stack skills on your saurus instead, and the team will be more effective as a result.


Some races are more effective at different TV than others.
for example chaos are bad at low TV but very dangerous at high TV when they're skilled.

The opposite would be norse and amazon who have great starting skills but AV7, so they're very strong at low TV where others have few skills. But as the TV climbs, they face opponents with more and more block, tackle, and mighty blow which will really punish their low armor.


These 2 factors (TV-management, and TV-sweet-spotting) are not really an issue in a league environment that BB was designed for, but blackbox isn't the environment BB was designed for.

If you're aiming to be effective in a TV-matching environment, it only makes sense to manage your TV and to play your team at a TV that best suits their race.

The majority of coaches will naturally do both of these things, to lesser or greater degrees.
Following these principles to the extreme is often referred to as min/maxing, and this is what will be discussed here."